目的:翻译化学治疗味觉改变量表(Chemotherapy induced Taste Alteration Scale,CiTAS),并验证其在中国乳腺癌化疗人群中的信效度.方法:按照Brislin量表跨文化翻译原则对英文版CiTAS量表进行汉化,确定中文版CiTAS量表各条目内容并对201名乳腺癌化学治疗患者进行调查,应用 SPSS软件分析确定其信效度.结果:中文版CiTAS量表共包括18个条目,通过探索性因子分析共可提取5个特征值大于1的公因子,累计方差贡献率为73.6％;各因子相互之间的相关性系数为0.377～0.595,各因子与总量表的相关性系数为0.683～0.759,差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0,01);量表条目水平的内容效度(item level content validity index,I-CVI)为0.8～1.0,总量表水平的内容效度(scale level content validity index, S-CVI)为0.94;总量表的克伦巴赫α系数为0.863(0.802～0.883);总量表的重测信度为0.903(0.870～0.932).结论:中文版CiTAS量表具有良好的信度及效度,适用于化疗患者的味觉改变测量.%Objective: To chinesize Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alteration Scale (CiTAS) and to verify its reliability and validity among breast cancer patients with chemotherapy in China. Methods: English-version CiTAS was chinesized according to the intercultural translation principles in Brislin Scale; entries in Chinese-version CiTAS were confirmed; and 201 breast cancer patients with chemotherapy were investigated. SPSS software was applied to analyze and confirm its reliability and validity. Results: There were 18 entries on Chinese-version CiTAS. Five characteristic values with common factor exceeding 1 were extracted depending on exploratory factor analysis and their accumulated variance contribution rate was 73.6％. The correlation coefficient among the factors varied from 0.377 to 0.595; the correlation coefficient between the factors and the total scale varied from 0.683 to 0.759; these were of statistical significance (P＜0.01). Item level content validity index (I-CVI) of the scale was between 0.8 and 1.0 and scale level content validity index (S-CVI) of the total scale was 0.94. Cronbacha ronbachaaracteristic values with 0.863, and the factors varied from 0.802 to 0.883. The test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.903, and the factors varied from 0.870 to 0.932. Conclusion: Chinese-version CiTAS is of good reliability and validity and is applicable to measure the taste alteration of breast cancer patients with chemotherapy.
展开▼
