目的：探讨本市城镇居民健康促进生活方式与亚健康状态的关系，为本地区亚健康人群不同生活方式的干预提供指导。方法采用《健康促进生活方式量表》（HPLP－Ⅱ）及《亚健康评定量表》（SHMSV1．0）对2428名在本院行常规身体检查的本市常住正常健康居民进行问卷调查，并对调查结果进行统计学分析。结果2428名被调查者中，健康者458例（18．86％），亚健康者1970例（81．14％）。健康人群SHMSV1．0评分为（88．45±5．23），亚健康人群SHMSV1．0评分为（61．96±4．25），有显著性差异（P＜0．05）。健康人群 HPLP －Ⅱ评分为（115．22±8．45），亚健康人群 HPLP －Ⅱ评分为（98．12±7．26）。亚健康人群HPLP－Ⅱ总分及各维度评分显著低于健康人群（P＜0．05）。亚健康状态与自我实现、运动锻炼、压力管理呈负相关（P＜0．05）。结论本市城镇居民亚健康比例较高，亚健康与健康促进方式有关，其中压力管理、运动锻炼、自我实现是亚健康的保护因素。%Objective To investigate the relationship between the city's urban residents in health‐promoting lifestyle and sub‐health status , to provide guidance of different lifestyle interventions . Method 2428 with routine physical examination in our hospital were accepted permanent resi‐dents healthy questionnaire ,and analyzed the survey results with Health Promoting Lifestyle Scale"(HPLP- Ⅱ) and"sub Rating Scale" (SHMSV1 .0) .Results There were 458 cases of healthy persons (18 .86% ) ,sub‐health were 1970 cases (81 .14% ) .Healthy people SHMSV1 .0 was (88 .45 ± 5 .23) ,health groups SHMSV1 .0 was (61 .96 ± 4 .25) points ,the differ‐ence was statistically significant (P<0 .05) .Healthy people HPLP-Ⅱ (115 .22 ± 8 .45) points ,health groups HPLP-Ⅱ (98 .12 ± 7 .26) points .Health groups HPLP-Ⅱ score and all dimension scores were significantly lower than in healthy people (P<0 .05) . After Pearson correlation factor analysis ,sub‐health status and self‐realization ,exercise ,stress management was negatively correlated (P<0 .05) .Conclusion The proportion of sub‐health in urban residents is higher ,Sub‐health is related to health promotion way in which stress management ,exercise ,self‐realization are a protective factor of sub‐health .
展开▼
