黄庆萱先生尝指出：语文中有为求平仄或押韵而非出于语文上自然倒装的情形。蔡宗阳先生进一步提出：为诗文格律而倒装，是修辞学上的倒装，出于作者为调和音律，突显重点，加强语势的修辞技巧，而与声韵有关。李丽文女士《诗经修辞研究》详列《诗经》为诗文格律而倒装347例，并举例详作说明。窃以为其所认定，稍嫌宽松。因此，以李书所列及蔡宗阳先生所举《大雅·桑柔》为基础，试为检讨格律倒装的认定标准。透过全面检讨《诗经》中所有“中O”结构词汇的意旨及其押韵地位，并考察先秦典籍的“中O”词汇结构与应用，得知学者所揭橥的格律倒装，确实存在。然而进行格律倒装辨识时，如果未能深究其语言习惯、词汇结构及意旨，纯依语句型态径行判定，容有可以商榷的余地。%＂Some inverted sentences are caused by rhyming purposely, not proceed naturally as time goes by.＂ Said Mr. Huang Chih- shun. Mr. Tsai also said that inverted sentences in poetry is also rhetoric technique. In the writing ＂Study on rhetoric in The Book of Songs （Shi Jing）＂ Ms. Lee Li-wen rises 347 examples of inverted sentence caused by rhyming and analyzes them. In my point of view, There is no proper standard to identify if a sentence inverted by rhyming or not in that book. Here I admit there is indeed inverted sentence caused by rhyming. However, we should consider not only sentence pattern but language customs and meaning when judge this kind of sentence to make the study more complete.
展开▼
