首页> 中文期刊> 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 >为制度进路辩护--反驳科恩对罗尔斯的一个批评

为制度进路辩护--反驳科恩对罗尔斯的一个批评

         

摘要

Rawls claims that social basic structure is the primary subject of justice.In order to achieve social justice,appropriate principles of justice must be found to regulate social institutions.Principles for indi-viduals are only to comply with and support just institutions.Institutional approach is criticized by G.A.Co-hen who believed that principles regulating social institutions should also be applied to individual conduct.Ac-cording to Cohen,institutions need not be attached any special importance in respect of promoting social jus-tice.However,Cohen’s objection cannot successfully undermine institutional approach.We can fully under-stand the relation between institution and social justice by analyzing and replying to this line of criticism.%罗尔斯主张社会基本结构是正义的首要主题。实现社会正义,需要寻求恰当的正义原则规范社会制度,而个人的正义责任仅仅在于服从和维护这种正义的制度。科恩对制度进路提出批评,认为规范社会制度的原则同时也适用于个人行为,就促进社会正义而言,制度并不占据特殊地位。然而,科恩的反驳并没有削弱制度进路的合理性。通过分析和回应这个批评,我们可以更加充分地理解制度、行为和社会正义之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号