The legal field always pays much attention to medical damage responsibility sharing, how to compensate the damaged patients and how to prevent medical damage in time. The fault principle and fault presumption principle inTortLiabilityActapplicable to medical damage are not sufficient to ease the growing tension of the physician-patient relationship. With the precondition of diverse sharing of medical risk, if we expand the application scope of the 59 clause of no-fault liability in Tort Liability Act and build a no-fault compensation system in medical damage liability, we can alleviate the current doctor-patient direct confrontation, protect the rights of both parties, and promote social harmony and stability.%医疗损害风险分担如何使病患损害得以填补并有效预防损害的发生，一直为法学界所关注。我国《侵权责任法》处理医疗纠纷适用的过错原则和过错推定原则不能很好地缓解日益紧张的医患关系。基于医疗风险多元分担的设想，在以过错责任为归责主体的前提下，有条件地扩大《侵权责任法》第59条无过错责任在医疗损害中的适用范围，在医疗损害责任中确定无过错补偿制度，能有利于缓解当前医患双方对立的局面，有效地保护医患双方的合法权益，促进社会的和谐稳定。
展开▼
