目的比较Mil ikan无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术在腹股沟嵌顿疝治疗中的优缺点。方法对近年来因腹股沟嵌顿疝采用Mil ikan术(96例)和传统疝修补术(18例)的患者，比较手术时间、下床活动时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症及复发情况。结果 Mil ikan术较传统疝修补术手术时间缩短，下床活动时间提前，住院时间缩短，术后并发症减少，复发率显著下降。结论Mil ikan术用于腹股沟嵌顿疝急诊手术是安全有效的，并发症少且复发率低，较传统术式有明显优势。%Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between Millikan tension-free hernioplasty and traditional hernio-plasty for inguinal incarcerated hernia. Methods Ninety six patients with inguinal incarcerated hernia received Mil ikan ten-sion-free hernioplasty and 18 patients received the traditional hernioplasty. The operation time, bedside training time, postopera-tive hospital stay, postoperative complications and the recurrence were compared between two groups. Results Compared to the traditional hernioplasty, the operation time, bedside training time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter;the recurrence rate and postoperative complication rate in Mil ikan tension-free hernioplasty were lower. Conclusion Compared to the traditional hernioplasty, Mil ikan tension-free hernioplasty is safer and more effective with less postoperative complications and lower recurrence rate.
展开▼
