• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of a graduated three layer straight tubular bandaging system when compared to a standard short stretch compression bandaging system in the management of people with venous ulceration: 3VSS2008
【2h】

Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of a graduated three layer straight tubular bandaging system when compared to a standard short stretch compression bandaging system in the management of people with venous ulceration: 3VSS2008

机译：协议进行的一项试点随机对照临床试验用于比较带刻度的三层直管绷带系统与标准短拉伸压缩绷带系统在治疗静脉溃疡患者中的有效性：3VSS2008

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BackgroundThe incidence of venous ulceration is rising with the increasing age of the general population. Venous ulceration represents the most prevalent form of difficult to heal wounds and these problematic wounds require a significant amount of health care resources for treatment. Based on current knowledge multi-layer high compression system is described as the gold standard for treating venous ulcers. However, to date, despite our advances in venous ulcer therapy, no convincing low cost compression therapy studies have been conducted and there are no clear differences in the effectiveness of different types of high compression.
机译：背景技术随着普通人群年龄的增长，静脉溃疡的发生率也在增加。静脉溃疡是难以愈合的伤口的最普遍形式，这些有问题的伤口需要大量的医疗资源进行治疗。基于当前的知识，多层高压系统被描述为治疗静脉溃疡的金标准。然而，迄今为止，尽管我们在静脉溃疡治疗方面取得了进步，但尚未进行令人信服的低成本压迫疗法研究，并且不同类型的高压迫疗法的疗效也没有明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号