• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking
【2h】

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking

机译：支持以证据为依据的卫生政策制定工具（STP）13：准备和使用政策简介来支持以证据为依据的政策制定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers.Policy briefs are a relatively new approach to packaging research evidence for policymakers. The first step in a policy brief is to prioritise a policy issue. Once an issue is prioritised, the focus then turns to mobilising the full range of research evidence relevant to the various features of the issue. Drawing on available systematic reviews makes the process of mobilising evidence feasible in a way that would not otherwise be possible if individual relevant studies had to be identified and synthesised for every feature of the issue under consideration. In this article, we suggest questions that can be used to guide those preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. These are: 1. Does the policy brief address a high-priority issue and describe the relevant context of the issue being addressed? 2. Does the policy brief describe the problem, costs and consequences of options to address the problem, and the key implementation considerations? 3. Does the policy brief employ systematic and transparent methods to identify, select, and assess synthesised research evidence? 4. Does the policy brief take quality, local applicability, and equity considerations into account when discussing the synthesised research evidence? 5. Does the policy brief employ a graded-entry format? 6. Was the policy brief reviewed for both scientific quality and system relevance?
机译：本文是针对负责制定卫生政策和计划的决策者以及支持这些决策者的人撰写的系列文章的一部分。政策简介是一种相对较新的方法，用于为决策者打包研究证据。政策摘要的第一步是确定政策问题的优先级。确定问题的优先级后，重点将转移到与问题的各个特征相关的所有研究证据中。利用现有的系统评价，使动员证据的过程变得可行，而如果必须针对正在考虑的问题的每个特征来识别和综合个人相关研究，则动员证据的过程是不可能的。在本文中，我们提出了一些问题，可以用来指导那些准备和使用政策摘要以支持循证决策的人。它们是：1.政策摘要是否解决了一个高度优先的问题，并描述了要解决的问题的相关背景？ 2.该政策摘要是否描述了问题，解决该问题的选择的成本和后果以及主要的实施注意事项？ 3.政策摘要是否采用系统和透明的方法来识别，选择和评估综合研究证据？ 4.在讨论综合研究证据时，政策简介是否考虑了质量，本地适​​用性和公平性因素？ 5.政策摘要是否采用分级输入格式？ 6.是否就科学质量和系统相关性对政策摘要进行了审查？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号