首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study

【2h】

How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study

机译：在实践中如何制定研究者与决策者之间的证据生成合作伙伴关系？定性访谈研究

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundEvidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers are a potential method for producing more relevant research with greater potential to impact on policy and practice. Little is known about how such partnerships are enacted in practice, however, or how to increase their effectiveness. We aimed to determine why researchers and policy-makers choose to work together, how they work together, which partnership models are most common, and what the key (1) relationship-based and (2) practical components of successful research partnerships are.

机译：背景研究人员与决策者之间的证据生成伙伴关系是一种产生更相关研究的潜在方法，其对政策和实践的影响更大。然而，人们对如何在实践中建立这种伙伴关系或如何提高其有效性知之甚少。我们旨在确定研究人员和决策者为什么选择一起工作，他们如何一起工作，哪种伙伴关系模型最常见以及成功的研究伙伴关系的关键（1）基于关系的要素和（2）实际要素是什么。

著录项

期刊名称 Health Research Policy and Systems
作者
Anna Williamson; Hannah Tait; Fadi El Jardali; Luke Wolfenden; Sarah Thackway; Jessica Stewart; Lyndal O’Leary; Julie Dixon;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2019(17),-1
年度 2019
页码 41
总页数 11
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
Partnership policy co-production;

机译：伙伴关系;政策;共同制作;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study [J] . Anna Williamson, Hannah Tait, Fadi El Jardali, Health Research Policy and Systems . 2019,第1期

机译：如何在实践中颁布的研究人员和政策制定者之间的证据发电伙伴关系？一个定性的面试学习
2. “What Should I Do Now?” : Navigating Relational Ethics in Practice as an Early Career Researcher as Illustrated by a Qualitative Interview Study About Women’s Drinking Practices [J] . Katherine Jackson International Journal of Qualitative Methods . 2021,第a期

机译：“我现在该怎么办？” ：在实践中导航利用伦理作为早期职业研究员，如妇女的饮酒实践的定性面试研究所示
3. Meta-analysis, complexity, and heterogeneity: a qualitative interview study of researchers’ methodological values and practices [J] . Theo Lorenc, Lambert Felix, Mark Petticrew, Systematic Reviews . 2016,第1期

机译：荟萃分析，复杂性和异质性：对研究人员方法论价值和实践的定性访谈研究
4. Identifying Important Components for Life Style Changes Using an Online Complex E-health Intervention in General Practice: a qualitative interview study [C] . Carl J. Brandt, Jane Clemensen, Jesper Bo Nielsen, International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine . 2016

机译：在一般实践中使用在线复杂的电子健康干预识别生活方式的重要组成部分：定性采访研究
5. A collection of research reporting, theoretical analysis, and practical applications in science education: Examining qualitative research methods, action research, educator -researcher partnerships, and constructivist learning theory. [D] . Hartle, R. Todd. 2007

机译：研究报告，理论分析和在科学教育中的实际应用的集合：审查定性研究方法，行动研究，教育者与研究者的伙伴关系以及建构主义学习理论。
6. Meta-analysis complexity and heterogeneity: a qualitative interview study of researchers’ methodological values and practices [O] . Theo Lorenc, Lambert Felix, Mark Petticrew, 2016

机译：荟萃分析复杂性和异质性：对研究人员方法论价值和实践的定性访谈研究
7. How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study [O] . Anna Williamson, Hannah Tait, Fadi El Jardali, 2019

机译：如何在实践中颁布的研究人员和政策制定者之间的证据发电伙伴关系？一个定性的面试学习
8. Evidence-Based Policy and Practice: The Role of the State in Advancing Criminal Justice Research, Findings from the Researcher Practitioner Partnerships Study (RPPS). [R] . B. A. Hunter B. S. Fisher T. P. Sullivan 2013

机译：基于证据的政策和实践：国家在推进刑事司法研究中的作用，研究者从业者伙伴关系研究（Rpps）的调查结果。

How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅