首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

【2h】

Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

机译：使用良好实践的九个共同主题清单作为评估省级研究与计划评估计划的研究优先级确定过程的工具

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundGiven the context-specific nature of health research prioritization and the obligation to effectively allocate resources to initiatives that will achieve the greatest impact, evaluation of priority setting processes can refine and strengthen such exercises and their outcomes. However, guidance is needed on evaluation tools that can be applied to research priority setting. This paper describes the adaption and application of a conceptual framework to evaluate a research priority setting exercise operating within the public health sector in Ontario, Canada.

机译：背景技术鉴于卫生研究优先次序的具体情况和有效分配资源给将产生最大影响的计划的义务，对重点确定过程的评估可以完善和加强此类工作及其结果。但是，需要有关可用于研究优先级设置的评估工具的指导。本文介绍了概念框架的适应性和应用，以评估加拿大安大略省公共卫生部门开展的研究重点设定工作。

著录项

期刊名称 Health Research Policy and Systems
作者
Rebecca L. Mador; Kathy Kornas; Anne Simard; Vinita Haroun;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2016(14),-1
年度 2016
页码 22
总页数 9
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
Evaluation Priority setting Public health Research priorities;

机译：评估;重点确定;公共卫生;研究重点;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program [J] . Rebecca L. Mador, Kathy Kornas, Anne Simard, Health Research Policy and Systems . 2016,第1期

机译：使用九个常见主题的良好练习核对表作为评估省级研究和计划评估计划的研究优先设置过程的工具
2. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice [J] . Roderik F Viergever, Sylvie Olifson, Abdul Ghaffar, Health Research Policy and Systems . 2010,第3期

机译：卫生研究重点确定清单：良好实践的九个共同主题
3. Evaluating the communities care program: best practice for rigorous research to evaluate gender based violence prevention and response programs in humanitarian settings [J] . N. Glass, N. Perrin, A. Clough, Conflict and Health . 2018,第1期

机译：评估社区护理计划：严格研究的最佳实践，以评估人道主义环境中基于性别的暴力预防和反应计划
4. Exploration and Practice of Process Assessment and Evaluation Method Based on Blended Learning : ——Take programming courses as an example [C] . Xiujuan Xie, Xiangju Li International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communications . 2020

机译：基于混合学习的过程评估方法的探索与实践：-以程序设计课程为例
5. Community of practice: Evaluation of a collaboration program in an educational setting. [D] . Citarelli Jones, Denise. 2016

机译：实践社区：在教育环境中评估合作计划。
6. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice [O] . Roderik F Viergever, Sylvie Olifson, Abdul Ghaffar, 2010

机译：卫生研究重点确定清单：良好实践的九个共同主题
7. Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program [O] . Rebecca L. Mador, Kathy Kornas, Anne Simard, 2016

机译：使用“良好实践的九个共同主题”清单作为评估省级研究与计划评估计划的研究优先级确定过程的工具
8. Evaluation Criteria and Priority Setting for State Highway Programs [R] . Humphrey, T. F. 1981

机译：国家公路项目评估标准和优先级设置

Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅