• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology >Cognitive phylogenies the Darwinian logic of descent and the inadequacy of cladistic thinking
【2h】

Cognitive phylogenies the Darwinian logic of descent and the inadequacy of cladistic thinking

机译：认知系统发育达尔文后裔逻辑以及单调思维的不足

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There has been a reappraisal of phylogenetic issues in cognitive science, as reconstructing cognitive phylogenies has been considered a key for unveiling the cognitive novelties that set the stage for what makes humans special. In our opinion, the studies made until now have approached cognitive phylogenies in a non-optimal way, and we wish to both highlight their problems, drawing on recent considerations in philosophy of biology. The inadequacy of current visions on cognitive phylogenies stems from the influence of the traditional “linear cladograms,” according to which every seemingly new or more sophisticated feature of a cognitive mechanism, viewed as a novelty, is represented as a node on top of the old and shared elements. We claim that this kind of cladograms does not succeed in depicting the complexity with which traits are distributed across species and, furthermore, that the labels of the nodes of these traditional representational systems fail to capture the “tinkering” nature of evolution. We argue that if we are to conceive of cognitive mechanisms in a multi-dimensional, bottom-up perspective, in accordance with the Darwinian logic of descent, we should rather focus on decomposing these mechanisms into lower-level, generic functions, which have the additional advantage of being implementable in neural matter, which ultimately produces cognition. Doing so renders current constructions of cognitive phylogenies otiose.
机译：认知科学已经对系统发生问题进行了重新评估，因为重建认知系统发生被认为是揭示认知新颖性的关键，这些新颖性为人类特殊性奠定了基础。我们认为，迄今为止进行的研究以非最佳方式处理了认知系统发育问题，我们希望根据生物学哲学中的最新考虑，突出它们的问题。当前对认知系统发育的认识不足源自传统的“线性cladograms”的影响，传统的“线性cladograms”认为认知机制的每个看似新的或更复杂的特征（被视为新颖性）都代表着旧的结点。和共享元素。我们声称，这种分类图未能成功地描述性状在物种间分布的复杂性，此外，这些传统表示系统的节点标签无法捕获进化的“修补”性质。我们认为，如果要按照达尔文的后裔逻辑从多维，自下而上的角度来构想认知机制，我们应该专注于将这些机制分解为具有以下功能的较低层通用函数：在神经物质中可实施的附加优势，最终会产生认知。这样做使得当前的认知系统发育构造变得简单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号