• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience >Memory Accessibility and Medical Decision-Making for Significant Others: The Role of Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting
【2h】

Memory Accessibility and Medical Decision-Making for Significant Others: The Role of Socially Shared Retrieval-Induced Forgetting

机译：重大人员的记忆可及性和医疗决策：社交共享检索引起的遗忘的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Medical decisions will often entail a broad search for relevant information. No sources alone may offer a complete picture, and many may be selective in their presentation. This selectivity may induce forgetting for previously learned material, thereby adversely affecting medical decision-making. In the study phase of two experiments, participants learned information about a fictitious disease and advantages and disadvantages of four treatment options. In the subsequent practice phase, they read a pamphlet selectively presenting either relevant (Experiment 1) or irrelevant (Experiment 2) advantages or disadvantages. A final cued recall followed and, in Experiment 2, a decision as to the best treatment for a patient. Not only did reading the pamphlet induce forgetting for related and unmentioned information, the induced forgetting adversely affected decision-making. The research provides a cautionary note about the risks of searching through selectively presented information when making a medical decision.
机译：医疗决策通常需要广泛搜索相关信息。没有单独的资料来源可以提供完整的图片，并且许多资料可能是选择性的。这种选择性可能会导致忘记先前学习的材料，从而对医学决策产生不利影响。在两个实验的研究阶段，参与者学习了有关虚拟疾病的信息以及四种治疗方案的优缺点。在随后的练习阶段，他们阅读了一本小册子，有选择地介绍了相关的（实验1）或无关的（实验2）优点或缺点。随后进行了最终提示的召回，在实验2中，决定了对患者的最佳治疗。阅读小册子不仅会导致忘记相关和未提及的信息，而且还会导致对决策的不利影响。该研究提供了有关在做出医疗决定时搜索通过选择性呈现的信息的风险的警告提示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号