首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Royal Society Open Science >Bringing ecology blogging into the scientific fold: measuring reach and impact of science community blogs
【2h】

Bringing ecology blogging into the scientific fold: measuring reach and impact of science community blogs

机译:将生态博客纳入科学领域:衡量科学社区博客的影响力和影响力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The popularity of science blogging has increased in recent years, but the number of academic scientists who maintain regular blogs is limited. The role and impact of science communication blogs aimed at general audiences is often discussed, but the value of science community blogs aimed at the academic community has largely been overlooked. Here, we focus on our own experiences as bloggers to argue that science community blogs are valuable to the academic community. We use data from our own blogs (n = 7) to illustrate some of the factors influencing reach and impact of science community blogs. We then discuss the value of blogs as a standalone medium, where rapid communication of scholarly ideas, opinions and short observational notes can enhance scientific discourse, and discussion of personal experiences can provide indirect mentorship for junior researchers and scientists from underrepresented groups. Finally, we argue that science community blogs can be treated as a primary source and provide some key points to consider when citing blogs in peer-reviewed literature.
机译:近年来,科学博客的流行程度有所提高,但是维护常规博客的学术科学家人数有限。经常讨论针对普通读者的科学传播博客的作用和影响,但是针对学术界的科学社区博客的价值却被大大忽略了。在这里,我们将重点放在自己作为博客作者的经历上来论证科学社区博客对学术界而言是有价值的。我们使用来自自己博客的数据(n = 7)来说明影响科学社区博客影响力和影响力的一些因素。然后,我们讨论博客作为独立媒介的价值,通过这种媒介,学术思想,观点和简短的观察笔记的快速交流可以增强科学论述,而个人经历的讨论可以为代表性不足的初级研究人员和科学家提供间接指导。最后,我们认为科学社区博客可以被视为主要来源,并提供了在同行评审文献中引用博客时要考虑的一些关键点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号