首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Scientific World Journal >Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics
【2h】

Democracies Restricting Democratic Rights: Some Classical Sources and Implications for Ethics of Biometrics

机译:限制民主权利的民主国家:生物识别伦理学的一些经典渊源和启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ancient Greek and 17 century English philosophy are not usually discussed along with the ethics of biometrics and data sharing. Academic ethics today, however, suffers from a lack of background in classical texts. We may discuss whether biometrics and data sharing are consistent with democracy, but if we do not know what democracy is, then we cannot know what actions are consistent with it. I shall discuss how and why democracies have restricted the rights of their citizens. I will give the most attention to two paradigms that have most influenced modern democratic thinking: 17 century English democracy and ancient Athens. I do not accept the dogma that the Athenians were obviously wrong to try and then to condemn Socrates. His death-loving doctrine could not but have weakened the will of the youth to work and fight for the good of Athens. I will try to understand the Athenians' point of view and their need to defend their security. At the end, I will apply these lessons to biometrics and data sharing for security reasons.
机译:通常不会与生物识别和数据共享的伦理一起讨论古希腊和17世纪的英国哲学。然而,今天的学术伦理受到古典文本缺乏背景的困扰。我们可能会讨论生物识别技术和数据共享是否与民主相一致,但是如果我们不知道什么是民主,那么我们将不知道有什么行动与之相符。我将讨论民主制度如何以及为什么限制了其公民的权利。我将最关注对现代民主思想影响最大的两个范例:17世纪的英国民主和古代雅典。我不接受这样的教条,即雅典人显然是错误的尝试然后谴责苏格拉底。他热爱死刑的学说只能削弱年轻人的工作和为雅典的利益而战的意志。我将尝试了解雅典人的观点以及他们捍卫自己的安全的需要。最后,出于安全考虑,我将这些课程应用于生物识别和数据共享。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号