• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sports Medicine International Open >Peak velocity and its time limit are as good as the velocity associated with VO2maxfor training prescription in runners
【2h】

Peak velocity and its time limit are as good as the velocity associated with VO2maxfor training prescription in runners

机译：峰值速度及其时间限制与VO相关的速度一样好2最大用于训练跑步者的处方

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study compared the effects of 4 weeks of training prescribed by peak velocity (V peak ) or velocity associated with maximum oxygen uptake (vVO 2max ) in moderately trained endurance runners. Study participants were 14 runners (18–35 years) randomized into 2 groups, named group VO 2 (GVO 2 ) and group V peak (GVP). The GVO 2 had training prescribed by vVO 2max and its time limit (t lim), whereas the GVP had training prescribed by Vpeakand its tlim. Four tests were performed on a treadmill: 2 maximum incremental for Vpeakand vVO2maxand 2 for their tlim. Performance (10 km) was evaluated on a 400 m track. Evaluations were repeated after 4 weeks of endurance training. The results showed a significant effect of training on Vpeak[GVP (16.7±1.2–17.6±1.5 km.h−1), GVO2(17.1±1.9–17.7±1.6 km·h−1)]; vVO2max[GVP (16.4±1.4–17.0±1.3 km·h−1), GVO2(17.2±1.7–17.5±1.9 km·h−1)]; and 10 km performance [GVP (41.3±2.4–39.9±2.7 min), GVO2(40.1±3.4–39.2±2.9 min)]. The Vpeakhighly correlated with performance in both pre- and post-training in GVP (–0.97;–0.86) and GVO2(–0.95;–0.94), as well as with vVO2maxin GVP (–0.82;–0.88) and GVO2(–0.99; –0.98). It is concluded that training prescribed by Vpeakpromoted similar improvements compared to training prescribed by vVO2max. The use of Vpeakis recommended due to its practical application and the low cost of determination.
机译：这项研究比较了在受过中等训练的耐力运动员中，以峰值速度（V peak）或与最大摄氧量相关的速度（vVO 2max）规定的4周训练的效果。研究参与者为14位跑步者（18-35岁），分为两组，分别称为VO 2组（GVO 2）和V高峰组（GVP）。 GVO 2受vVO 2max及其时限（t lim），而GVP接受了V规定的培训峰和它的t林。在跑步机上进行了四项测试：V的2个最大增量峰和vVO2最大和2为他们的t林。在400 m的跑道上评估了性能（10 km）。耐力训练4周后，重复评估。结果表明训练对V有显着影响峰[GVP（16.7±1.2–17.6±1.5公里。H −1 ），GVO2（17.1±1.9–17.7±1.6 km·h −1 ）]; VO2最大[GVP（16.4±1.4–17.0±1.3 km·h −1 ），GVO 2 （17.2±1.7–17.5±1.9 km·h −1 ）];和10 km的表现[GVP（41.3±2.4–39.9±2.7 min），GVO 2 （40.1±3.4–39.2±2.9 min）]。 V peak 与训练前和训练后GVP（–0.97; –0.86）和GVO的表现高度相关 2 （–0.95; –0.94），以及vVO 2max 在GVP（–0.82; –0.88）和GVO中 2 （–0.99; –0.98）。结论是V规定的训练 peak 与vVO规定的培训相比，促进了类似的改进 2max 。 V的使用 peak 由于其实际应用和确定成本低，建议使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号