• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Long Term Effects of Different Training Modalities on Power Speed Skill and Anaerobic Capacity in Young Male Basketball Players
【2h】

Long Term Effects of Different Training Modalities on Power Speed Skill and Anaerobic Capacity in Young Male Basketball Players

机译：不同训练方式对青年男篮运动员力量速度技能和无氧运动能力的长期影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of 4 months of different training modalities on power, speed, skill and anaerobic capacity in 15-16 year old male basketball players. Thirty five Lithuanian basketball players were randomly assigned into three groups: power endurance group (intermittent exercise, PE, n = 12), general endurance group (continuous exercise, GE, n = 11) and control group (regular basketball training, CG, n = 12). The power endurance model was based in basketball game external structure whereas the general endurance model was based in continuous actions that frequently occur during the basketball game. The training models were used for 16 weeks in sessions conducted 3 times a week during 90 minutes each in the competition period. The following tests were performed: 20 m speed run, Squat jump, Countermovement jump, Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST), 2 min. shooting test and the Shuttle ball-dribbling test. A 3×2 repeated measures ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences in the 20 m speed run, Squat jump and Countermovement jump (p > 0.05). On the other hand, RAST showed significant increases in PE, with greater increases during the 5th and 6th runs. The PE training model also produced a significant improvement in the shuttle ball-dribbling test (48.7 ± 1.5 in the pretest, 45.5 ± 1.3 in the posttest, p < 0.05). Globally, our results suggest that both training modalities were able to maintain initial values of speed and power, however, the anaerobic capacity and skill increased only in the players from the power endurance group. Therefore, the power endurance training (intermittent high intensity exercise) may be more beneficial to prepare junior players according to the game cardiovascular and metabolic specific determinants.Key Points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Power endurance training produced significant increases in anaerobic capacity during the competition period.Power endurance training did not have a detrimental effect on power or speed performance during the competition period.The greatest differences between general endurance and power endurance training were noticed during the 5th and 6th runs of the RAST test.
机译：这项研究的目的是确定15-16岁的男性篮球运动员在4个月的不同训练方式下对力量，速度，技能和无氧运动能力的影响。将35名立陶宛篮球运动员随机分为三组：力量耐力组（间歇运动，PE，n = 12），一般耐力组（连续运动，GE，n = 11）和对照组（常规篮球训练，CG，n = 12）。力量耐力模型基于篮球比赛的外部结构，而一般耐力模型基于篮球比赛中经常发生的连续动作。在比赛期间，在每周90分钟的时间里，每周进行3次，每次为期16个星期的训练模型。进行了以下测试：20 m速度跑，下蹲跳，反向运动跳，基于跑步的厌氧冲刺测试（RAST），2分钟。射击测试和穿梭球运球测试。 3×2的重复测量方差分析表明，在20 m速度跑，下蹲跳和反运动跳中，无统计学差异（p> 0.05）。另一方面，RAST显示PE显着增加，在第5 和第6 跑步中增加幅度更大。 PE训练模型还显着改善了穿梭球运球测试（前测48.7±1.5，后测45.5±1.3，p <0.05）。在全球范围内，我们的结果表明，两种训练方式都能够保持速度和力量的初始值，但是，无氧能力和技巧仅在力量耐力组的运动员中有所增加。因此，力量耐力训练（间歇性高强度运动）可能会根据游戏的心血管和代谢特定决定因素而更有利于初中级选手的训练。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type：disc” > <！-list-behavior =无序前缀-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 耐力训练在比赛期间显着提高了无氧能力。 力量耐力训练对比赛期间的力量或速度表现没有不利影响。 在第5 sups中，一般耐力训练和力量耐力训练之间的最大差异是 RAST测试的sup>和第6 次运行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号