Life Science Professional Societies Expand Undergraduate Education Efforts

机译：生命科学专业协会扩大了本科教育的力度

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education reports cite the critical role of professional societies in undergraduate life science education and, since 2008, have called for the increased involvement of professional societies in support of undergraduate education. Our study explored the level of support being provided by societies for undergraduate education and documented changes in support during the Vision and Change era. Society representatives responded to a survey on programs, awards, meetings, membership, teaching resources, publications, staffing, finances, evaluation, and collaborations that address undergraduate faculty and students. A longitudinal comparison group of societies responded to surveys in both 2008 and 2014. Results indicate that life science professional societies are extensively engaged in undergraduate education in their fields, setting standards for their discipline, providing vetted education resources, engaging students in both research and education, and enhancing professional development and recognition/status for educators. Societies are devoting funding and staff to these efforts and engaging volunteer leadership. Longitudinal comparison group responses indicate there have been significant and quantifiable expansions of undergraduate efforts in many areas since 2008. These indicators can serve as a baseline for defining, aligning, and measuring how professional societies can promote sustainable, evidence-based support of undergraduate education initiatives.

机译：《本科生生物学教育的远景与变化》报告援引了专业社团在本科生生命科学教育中的关键作用，自2008年以来，呼吁专业社团更多地参与支持本科教育。我们的研究探讨了社会为本科教育提供的支持水平，并记录了“远见与变革”时代的支持变化。社会代表回应了一项针对计划，奖项，会议，会员资格，教学资源，出版物，人员配备，财务，评估以及针对本科师生的合作的调查。一个纵向的社会比较团体对2008年和2014年的调查做出了回应。结果表明，生命科学专业学会广泛从事各自领域的本科教育，为其学科设定标准，提供经过审查的教育资源，并使学生参与研究和教育，并增强教育工作者的专业发展和认可/地位。社会正在将资金和人员投入到这些工作中，并吸引志愿者的领导。纵向比较小组的答复表明，自2008年以来，许多领域的本科生工作已取得了显着且可量化的扩展。这些指标可以作为定义，调整和衡量专业协会如何促进可持续的，循证的本科教育计划支持的基准。

著录项

期刊名称 CBE Life Sciences Education
作者
Marsha Lakes Matyas; Elizabeth A. Ruedi; Katie Engen; Amy L. Chang;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2017(16),1
年度 2017
页码 ar5
总页数 12
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类生理学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Life Science Professional Societies Expand Undergraduate Education Efforts [J] . Marsha Lakes Matyas, Elizabeth A. Ruedi, Katie Engen, CBE Life Sciences Education . 2017,第1期

机译：生命科学专业协会扩大了本科教育的力度
2. Barriers to integration of bioinformatics into undergraduate life sciences education: A national study of US life sciences faculty uncover significant barriers to integrating bioinformatics into undergraduate instruction [J] . Jason J. Williams, Jennifer C. Drew, Sebastian Galindo-Gonzalez, PLoS One . 2019,第11期

机译：生物信息学融入本科生生命科学教育的障碍：美国生命科学教师的全国研究揭示了将生物信息学融入本科教学的重要障碍
3. Educational background and professional participation by federal wildlife biologists: implications for science, management, and The Wildlife Society [J] . Schmutz JA Wildlife Society Bulletin . 2002,第2期

机译：联邦野生生物生物学家的教育背景和专业参与：对科学，管理和野生动物学会的影响
4. The NASA Space Life Sciences Training Program: An Important Component of the Space Life Sciences Effort [C] . L. Chamberlin, G. Cooulter, M. Shepanek AIAA Life Sciences and Space Medicine Conference '95 April 3-5, 1995/Houston, TX . 1995

机译：NASA太空生命科学培训计划：太空生命科学工作的重要组成部分
5. Identifying barriers to Science, Technology, Society and environment (STSE) educational goals and pedagogy in science education: A case study of UMASS Lowell undergraduate engineering. [D] . Phaneuf, Tiffany. 2013

机译：确定科学教育中科学，技术，社会与环境（STSE）教育目标和教学法的障碍：以UMASS Lowell本科工程为例。
6. Barriers to integration of bioinformatics into undergraduate life sciences education: A national study of US life sciences faculty uncover significant barriers to integrating bioinformatics into undergraduate instruction [O] . Jason J. Williams, Jennifer C. Drew, Sebastian Galindo-Gonzalez, 2019

机译：生物信息学融入本科生科学教育的障碍：美国生命科学教师的全国研究揭示了将生物信息学融入本科教学的重要障碍
7. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure) developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation endorsed by the heart failure society of america51The document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in November 2001 and the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in September 2001.52When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ, Packer M, Silver MA, Stevenson LW. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2101–13.53The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association make every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.54This document, as well as the corresponding full-text guidelines, is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). Single reprints of the executive summary are available for $5.00 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. To purchase additional reprints up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or e-mail pubauth@heart.org (specify version: Executive Summary—71-0125; Full Text—71-1026).55© 2001 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Hunt Sharon A, Baker David W, Chin Marshall H, 2001

机译：ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：执行摘要美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会修订1995年心脏评估和管理指南与美国心力衰竭学会认可的国际心脏和肺移植协会合作51）该文件于2001年11月获得美国心脏病学会理事会的批准，并于2001年9月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准.52引用本文件时，美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Hunt SA，Baker DW，Chin MH，Cinquegrani MP，Feldman AM，Francis GS，Ganiats TG，Goldstein S，Gregoratos G，Jessup ML，Noble RJ，Packer M，Silver MA，Stevenson LW。 ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（修订1995年《美国心脏病学会评估和管理指南》的委员会心脏衰竭）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38：2101–13.53美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会竭尽全力避免由于外部关系或个人，专业或其他原因而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。写作小组成员的商业利益。具体而言，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审查，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。54本文档以及相应的全文指南可在万维网上找到。美国心脏病学院（www.acc.org）和美国心脏协会（www.americanheart.org）的网站。致电800-253-4636（仅适用于美国）或写信给美国心脏病，教育服务学院，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，可以执行摘要的单个重印本，每张5.00美元。要购买最多999份的其他重印本，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671； 1000或更多副本，请致电214-706-1466，传真214-691-6342或电子邮件pubauth@heart.org（指定版本：执行摘要-71-0125；全文-71-1026）。55©2001美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会有限公司

Life Science Professional Societies Expand Undergraduate Education Efforts

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅