首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Womens Health >The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; The impact on future fertility: A randomised controlled trial

【2h】

The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; The impact on future fertility: A randomised controlled trial

机译：ESEP研究：输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术治疗输卵管异位妊娠；对未来生育力的影响：一项随机对照试验

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundFor most tubal ectopic pregnancies (EP) surgery is the treatment of first choice. Whether surgical treatment should be performed conservatively (salpingostomy) or radically (salpingectomy) in women wishing to preserve their reproductive capacity, is subject to debate. Salpingostomy preserves the tube, but bears the risks of both persistent trophoblast and repeat ipsilateral tubal EP. Salpingectomy, avoids these risks, but leaves only one tube for reproductive capacity. This study aims to reveal the trade-off between both surgical options: whether the potential advantage of salpingostomy, i.e. a better fertility prognosis as compared to salpingectomy, outweighs the potential disadvantages, i.e. persistent trophoblast and an increased risk for a repeat EP.

机译：背景对于大多数输卵管异位妊娠（EP）手术是首选治疗方法。对于希望保留其生殖能力的女性，是否应保守治疗（开鼻吻合术）还是彻底治疗（输卵管切除术）尚有争议。输卵管造口术可以保留输卵管，但具有持续滋养层和重复同侧输卵管EP的风险。输卵管切除术避免了这些风险，但仅留出一根生殖管。这项研究旨在揭示两种手术选择之间的权衡：输卵管造口术的潜在优势（即与输卵管切除术相比具有更好的生育能力）是否克服了潜在的弊端，即持续的滋养层和再次发生EP的风险增加。

著录项

期刊名称 BMC Womens Health
作者
Femke Mol; Annika Strandell; Davor Jurkovic; Tamer Yalcinkaya; Harold R Verhoeve; Carolien AM Koks; Paul JQ van der Linden; Giuseppe CM Graziosi; Andreas L Thurkow; Annemieke Hoek; Lars Hogström; Ingemar Klinte; Kerstin Nilsson; Norah M van Mello; Willem M Ankum; Fulco van der Veen; Ben WM Mol; Petra J Hajenius;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2008(8),-1
年度 2008
页码 11
总页数 7
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类生理学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): An open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J] . MolF., VanMelloN.M., StrandellA., The Lancet . 2014,第9927期

机译：SalpingOtomy与输卵管妊娠的女性的Salpingectomy（ESEP学习）：开放式标签，多期，随机对照试验
2. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): An open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J] . MolF., VanMelloN.M., StrandellA., The Lancet . 2014,第9927期

机译：输卵管妊娠妇女的输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术（ESEP研究）：一项开放性，多中心，随机对照试验
3. Salpingotomy Versus Salpingectomy in Women With Tubal Pregnancy_.(EurQ.pean Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy Study):-An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial [J] . Femke Mol, Norah M. van Mello, Annika Strell, Obstetrical and gynecological survey . 2014,第9期

机译：输卵管妊娠与输卵管切除术在输卵管妊娠妇女中的应用（异位妊娠研究中的EurQ.pean手术）：-开放标签，多中心，随机对照试验
4. Economic impact of remote specialist consultations using videoconferencing: an economic model based on data from randomised controlled trials [C] . Trine S. Bergmo International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine . 2014

机译：远程专家使用视频会议的经济影响：基于随机对照试验数据的经济模式
5. A case-control study of risk factors for ectopic pregnancy using routinely collected administrative data. [D] . Hockin, James Charles. 1990

机译：使用常规收集的管理数据进行异位妊娠危险因素的病例对照研究。
6. A multi-centre double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial of combination methotrexate and gefitinib versus methotrexate alone to treat tubal ectopic pregnancies (GEM3): trial protocol [O] . James May, Colin Duncan, Ben Mol, 2018

机译：甲氨蝶呤和吉非替尼联合单用甲氨蝶呤治疗输卵管异位妊娠（GEM3）的多中心双盲安慰剂对照随机试验
7. The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; The impact on future fertility: A randomised controlled trial [O] . Femke Mol, null null, Annika Strandell, 2008

机译：ESEP研究：输卵管切开术与输卵管切除术治疗输卵管异位妊娠；对未来生育力的影响：一项随机对照试验

The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; The impact on future fertility: A randomised controlled trial

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅