首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Cancer >Comparison of two threshold detection criteria methodologies for determination of probe positivity for intraoperative in situ identification of presumed abnormal 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites during radioguided oncologic surgery
【2h】

Comparison of two threshold detection criteria methodologies for determination of probe positivity for intraoperative in situ identification of presumed abnormal 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites during radioguided oncologic surgery

机译:两种阈值检测标准方法的比较用于确定在放射引导的肿瘤外科手术中原位鉴定推测的异常18F-FDG-avid组织部位的探针阳性率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIntraoperative in situ identification of 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites during radioguided oncologic surgery remains a significant challenge for surgeons. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the 1.5-to-1 ratiometric threshold criteria method versus the three-sigma statistical threshold criteria method for determination of gamma detection probe positivity for intraoperative in situ identification of presumed abnormal 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites in a manner that was independent of the specific type of gamma detection probe used.
机译:背景技术在放射引导的肿瘤外科手术中术中原位识别 18 F-FDG-avid组织部位仍然是外科医生面临的重大挑战。本研究的目的是评估1.5比1比例阈值标准方法与三西格玛统计阈值标准方法在确定术中原发性推测 18 的伽玛检测探针阳性中的确定性。 F-FDG-avid组织部位的定位方式与所使用的伽马检测探针的具体类型无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号