首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Using Team-based Learning to Teach a Hybrid Pharmacokinetics Course Online and in Class
【2h】

Using Team-based Learning to Teach a Hybrid Pharmacokinetics Course Online and in Class

机译:使用基于团队的学习在网上和课堂上教授混合药物动力学课程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To compare the effectiveness of face-to-face and online team-based learning (TBL) to teach phenytoin pharmacokinetics.>Design. A TBL format was used to teach an online cohort of 222 pharmacy students and two face-to-face cohorts (Tampa and Las Vegas) of pharmacy students. Students in all cohorts completed individual and team readiness tests (iRATs and tRATs), and a self-assessment survey to determine teamwork and content understanding. Knowledge retention questions also were added to the final examination.>Assessment. Mean scores on iRATs were: 54% for the Tampa group; 72% for the Las Vegas group; and 58% for the online. Mean tRAT scores were 78.5% for the Tampa cohort and 82.2% for the Las Vegas cohort, compared to 89.5% for the online cohort. The mean tRAT scores for the online cohorts were significantly higher than those of the face-to-face cohorts. Data from the teamwork survey provided evidence of positive interactions among teams for all cohorts.>Conclusion. Team-based learning can be an effective method for teaching applied pharmacokinetics in both face-to-face and online classes.
机译:>目的。为了比较面对面学习和在线基于团队的学习(TBL)进行苯妥英钠药代动力学研究的有效性。>设计。采用了TBL格式来教在线队列的222名药房学生和两名面对面的药房学生(坦帕和拉斯维加斯)。所有队列中的学生均完成了个人和团队准备测试(iRAT和tRAT),并进行了自我评估调查,以确定团队合作和对内容的理解。 >评估。iRAT的平均得分为:坦帕组为54%;拉斯维加斯集团占72%; 58%用于在线。坦帕(tampa)队列和拉斯维加斯(t拉斯维加斯)队列的平均tRAT分数分别为78.5%和82.2%,而在线队列为89.5%。在线队列的平均tRAT分数显着高于面对面队列的tRAT分数。团队合作调查的数据提供了所有队列中团队之间积极互动的证据。>结论。基于团队的学习可以是在面对面和在线课程中教授应用药代动力学的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号