首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Deciding for others as a neutral party recruits risk-neutral perspective-taking: Model-based behavioral and fMRI experiments
【2h】

Deciding for others as a neutral party recruits risk-neutral perspective-taking: Model-based behavioral and fMRI experiments

机译:决定他人为中立者时会招募风险中立的观点承担者:基于模型的行为和功能磁共振成像实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Risky decision making for others is ubiquitous in our societies. Whereas financial decision making for oneself induces strong concern about the worst outcome (maximin concern) as well as the expected value, behavioral and neural characteristics of decision making for others are less well understood. We conducted behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments to examine the neurocognitive underpinnings of risky decisions for an anonymous other, using decisions for self as a benchmark. We show that, although the maximin concern affected both types of decisions equally strongly, decision making for others recruited a more risk-neutral computational mechanism than decision making for self. Specifically, participants exhibited more balanced information search when choosing a risky option for others. Activity of right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ, associated with cognitive perspective taking) was parametrically modulated by options’ expected values in decisions for others, and by the minimum amounts in decisions for self. Furthermore, individual differences in self-reported empathic concern modified these attentional and neural processes. Overall, these results indicate that the typical maximin concern is attenuated in a risk-neutral direction in decisions for others as compared to self. We conjecture that, given others’ diverse preferences, deciding as a neutral party may cognitively recruit such risk-neutrality.
机译:在我们的社会中,对他人的冒险决策无处不在。尽管对自己的财务决策会引起对最差结果(最大关注)以及预期价值的强烈关注,但对他人决策的行为和神经特征却鲜为人知。我们进行了行为和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)实验,以自我决策为基准,检查了匿名决策的风险决策的神经认知基础。我们表明,尽管最大的关注点对两种类型的决策都产生了同等强烈的影响,但是针对他人的决策所招募的风险机制要比针对自身的决策更具风险中立性。具体来说,当参与者选择其他风险选项时,他们表现出更加均衡的信息搜索。右颞颞顶交界处的活动(rTPJ,与认知观点的获取有关)受选项在他人决策中的期望值和自我决策中的最小值的影响。此外,自我报告的共情关注中的个体差异改变了这些注意力和神经过程。总体而言,这些结果表明,与自我相比,在针对他人的决策中,典型的最大关注点在风险中性方向上有所减弱。我们推测,考虑到其他人的不同偏好,决定作为中立的一方可能会在认知上招募这种风险中立的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号