首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >An algorithm for quantitatively estimating non-occupational pesticide exposure intensity for spouses in the Agricultural Health Study
【2h】

An algorithm for quantitatively estimating non-occupational pesticide exposure intensity for spouses in the Agricultural Health Study

机译:农业健康研究中定量评估配偶非职业性农药暴露强度的算法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Residents of agricultural areas experience pesticide exposures from sources other than direct agricultural work. We developed a quantitative, active ingredient specific algorithm for cumulative (adult, married lifetime) non occupational pesticide exposure intensity for spouses of farmers who applied pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS). The algorithm addressed three exposure pathways: take home, agricultural drift, and residential pesticide use. Pathway-specific equations combined (i) weights derived from previous meta analyses of published pesticide exposure data and (ii) information from the questionnaire on frequency and duration of pesticide use by applicators, home proximity to treated fields, residential pesticide usage (e.g., termite treatments), and spouse’s off farm employment (proxy for time at home). The residential use equation also incorporated a published probability matrix that documented the likelihood active ingredients were used in home pest treatment products. We illustrate use of these equations by calculating exposure intensities for the insecticide chlorpyrifos and herbicide atrazine for 19,959 spouses. Non zero estimates for ≥1 pathway were found for 78% and 77% of spouses for chlorpyrifos and atrazine, respectively. Variability in exposed spouses’ intensity estimates was observed for both pesticides, with 75th to 25th percentile ratios ranging from 7.1−7.3 for take home, 6.5−8.5 for drift, 2.4−2.8 for residential use, and 3.8−7.0 for the summed pathways. Take home and drift estimates were highly correlated (≥0.98), but were not correlated with residential use (0.01−0.02). This algorithm represents an important advancement in quantifying non occupational pesticide relative exposure differences and will facilitate improved etiologic analyses in the AHS spouses. The algorithm could be adapted to studies with similar information.
机译:农业地区的居民除了直接从事农业工作外,还接触其他来源的农药。我们为农业健康研究(AHS)中使用农药的农民的配偶开发了一种定量,有效成分特定的算法,用于累积(成人,已婚寿命)非职业农药暴露强度。该算法解决了三种暴露途径:带回家,农业漂流和居民使用农药。特定于途径的方程式结合了(i)从先前公布的农药暴露数据的荟萃分析中得出的权重,以及(ii)问卷中有关施药者使用农药的频率和持续时间,靠近处理地的住所,居民使用农药(例如白蚁)的信息待遇),以及配偶的非农就业(在家工作的时间代理)。住宅使用等式还结合了已发布的概率矩阵,该矩阵记录了活性成分在家庭害虫处理产品中使用的可能性。我们通过计算19959个配偶的杀虫剂毒死rif和除草剂at去津的暴露强度来说明这些方程式的使用。毒死rif和阿特拉津的配偶中,≥1途径的非零估计值分别为78%和77%。两种农药的暴露配偶强度估计值均存在差异,带回家的百分率为75 到25 ,回家的百分比范围为7.1-7.3,漂流的百分比范围为6.5-8.5,住宅使用2.4-2.8,总路径使用3.8-7.0。带回家和漂移估计值高度相关(≥0.98),但与住宅用途不相关(0.01-0.02)。该算法代表了量化非职业农药相对暴露差异的重要进展,并将有助于改善AHS配偶的病因分析。该算法可以适用于具有相似信息的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号