首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Measuring Vapor Intrusion: From Source Science Politics to a Transdisciplinary Approach
【2h】

Measuring Vapor Intrusion: From Source Science Politics to a Transdisciplinary Approach

机译:测量蒸汽入侵:从源科学政治到跨学科方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Investigation of indoor air quality has been on the upswing in recent years. In this article, we focus on how the transport of subsurface vapors into indoor air spaces, a process known as “vapor intrusion,” (VI) is defined and addressed. For environmental engineers and physical scientists who specialize in this emerging indoor environmental exposure science, VI is notoriously difficult to characterize, leading the regulatory community to seek improved science-based understandings of VI pathways and exposures. Yet despite the recent growth in VI science and competition between environmental consulting companies, VI studies have largely overlooked the social and political field in which VI problems emerge and are experienced by those at risk. To balance and inform current VI studies, this article explores VI science and policy and develops a critique of what we call “source science politics.” Drawing inspiration from the creative synthesis of social and environmental science/engineering perspectives, the article offers a transdisciplinary approach to VI that highlights collaboration with social scientists and impacted communities and cultivates epistemic empathy.
机译:近年来,室内空气质量的研究一直在上升。在本文中,我们集中于如何定义和解决地下蒸汽向室内空气空间的运输过程,即所谓的“蒸汽侵入”(VI)。对于专门研究这种新兴室内环境暴露科学的环境工程师和物理科学家而言,VI难以表征,这导致监管机构寻求对VI途径和暴露的基于科学的更好理解。尽管VI科学的发展和环境咨询公司之间的竞争日益激烈,但VI研究在很大程度上忽视了VI问题出现并面临风险的人所经历的社会和政治领域。为了平衡和指导当前的VI研究,本文探讨了VI科学和政策,并对我们所谓的“源科学政治”提出了批评。本文从社会和环境科学/工程学观点的创造性综合中汲取了灵感,为VI提供了一种跨学科的方法,强调了与社会科学家和受影响社区的合作,并培养了认知移情。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号