首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Accuracy of Un-supervised Versus Provider-Supervised Self-administered HIV Testing in Uganda: A Randomized Implementation Trial
【2h】

Accuracy of Un-supervised Versus Provider-Supervised Self-administered HIV Testing in Uganda: A Randomized Implementation Trial

机译:在乌干达无监督与提供者监督的自我管理的艾滋病毒检测的准确性:随机实施试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Unsupervised HIV self-testing (HST) has potential to increase knowledge of HIV status; however, its accuracy is unknown. To estimate the accuracy of unsupervised HST in field settings in Uganda, we performed a non-blinded, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of unsupervised compared with supervised HST among selected high HIV risk fisherfolk (22.1 % HIV Prevalence) in three fishing villages in Uganda between July and September 2013. The study enrolled 246 participants and randomized them in a 1:1 ratio to unsupervised HST or provider-supervised HST. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the HST sensitivity was 90 % in the unsupervised arm and 100 % among the provider-supervised, yielding a difference 0f −10 % (90 % CI −21, 1 %); non-inferiority was not shown. In a per protocol analysis, the difference in sensitivity was −5.6 % (90 % CI −14.4, 3.3 %) and did show non-inferiority. We conclude that unsupervised HST is feasible in rural Africa and may be non-inferior to provider-supervised HST.
机译:无监督的艾滋病毒自我测试(HST)有可能增加对艾滋病毒状况的了解;但是,其准确性是未知的。为了评估乌干达田间环境中无监督的HST的准确性,我们在美国三个渔村中对部分高HIV风险渔民(22.1%的HIV患病率)进行了无监督,无监督的HST与有监督的HST比较的非劣效性试验。乌干达在2013年7月至2013年9月之间。该研究招募了246名参与者,并以1:1的比例将他们随机分配到无监督的HST或提供者监督的HST。在意向性治疗分析中,无监督者的HST敏感性为90%,而提供者监督者的HST敏感性为100%,相差0f -10%(90%CI -21,1%)。没有显示出自卑感。在每个方案分析中,敏感性差异为-5.6%(90%CI -14.4,3.3%),并且确实显示出自卑感。我们得出的结论是,无监督的HST在非洲农村地区是可行的,并且可能不逊于提供者监督的HST。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号