首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Optimization of Ionic Liquid Based Simultaneous Ultrasonic- and Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Rutin and Quercetin from Leaves of Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) by Response Surface Methodology
【2h】

Optimization of Ionic Liquid Based Simultaneous Ultrasonic- and Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Rutin and Quercetin from Leaves of Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) by Response Surface Methodology

机译:响应面法优化离子液体基于超声波和微波同时提取天鹅绒(Abutilon theophrasti)叶中芦丁和槲皮素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An ionic liquids based simultaneous ultrasonic and microwave assisted extraction (ILs-UMAE) method has been proposed for the extraction of rutin (RU), quercetin (QU), from velvetleaf leaves. The influential parameters of the ILs-UMAE were optimized by the single factor and the central composite design (CCD) experiments. A 2.00 M 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([C4mim]Br) was used as the experimental ionic liquid, extraction temperature 60°C, extraction time 12 min, liquid-solid ratio 32 mL/g, microwave power of 534 W, and a fixed ultrasonic power of 50 W. Compared to conventional heating reflux extraction (HRE), the RU and QU extraction yields obtained by ILs-UMAE were, respectively, 5.49 mg/g and 0.27 mg/g, which increased, respectively, 2.01-fold and 2.34-fold with the recoveries that were in the range of 97.62–102.36% for RU and 97.33–102.21% for QU with RSDs lower than 3.2% under the optimized UMAE conditions. In addition, the shorter extraction time was used in ILs-UMAE, compared with HRE. Therefore, ILs-UMAE was a rapid and an efficient method for the extraction of RU and QU from the leaves of velvetleaf.
机译:有人提出了一种基于离子液体的超声波和微波辅助提取方法(ILs-UMAE),用于从平叶中提取芦丁(RU),槲皮素(QU)。 ILs-UMAE的影响参数通过单因素和中心复合设计(CCD)实验进行了优化。实验离子液体为2.00 M 1-丁基-3-甲基咪唑溴化物([C4mim] Br),萃取温度60°C,萃取时间12 min,液固比32 mL / g,微波功率534 W与常规加热回流萃取(HRE)相比,ILs-UMAE的RU和QU萃取产率分别为5.49μmg/ g和0.27μmg/ g,分别增加了,在优化的UMAE条件下,RU的回收率分别为97.62–102.36%和QU的97.33–102.21%,其RSD低于3.2%,分别为2.01倍和2.34倍。此外,与HRE相比,ILs-UMAE中使用的提取时间更短。因此,ILs-UMAE是一种快速而有效的方法,用于从平叶中提取RU和QU。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号