首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >Ethical issues in the use of online social media forums by GPs
【2h】

Ethical issues in the use of online social media forums by GPs

机译:全科医生使用在线社交媒体论坛的道德问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

General practice consultations frequently present ethical challenges. However, short appointments and full clinics leave little opportunity for ethical discussion and reflection. Relative professional isolation, time pressures, and the lack of formal structures for ethics advice found in secondary care also make support difficult for GPs to access. Consequently, GPs may rely on informal online sources for advice on ethical dilemmas. GP groups on social media forums (SMFs), originally established to provide a platform for GPs to discuss clinical queries and for professional networking, increasingly include discussion of ethical problems. The General Medical Council (GMC) and Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) have published specific guidance regarding the use of social media by doctors, including the importance of considering potential ethical challenges such as confidentiality, and professionalism. However, although these provide extensive advice regarding online discussions between doctors and their patients, they fail to provide guidance relating to the use of groups on SMFs, and therefore do not focus on potential issues that might arise for doctors using these.
机译:全科医疗咨询经常会带来道德挑战。但是,短期任命和完整的诊所几乎没有机会进行道德讨论和反思。相对的专业隔离,时间压力以及二级保健中缺乏正规的道德咨询结构也使全科医生难以获得支持。因此,全科医生可能会依赖非正式的在线资源来寻求有关道德困境的建议。社交媒体论坛(SMF)上的GP小组最初成立是为了为GP提供一个讨论临床问题和进行专业网络交流的平台,越来越多地包括对道德问题的讨论。通用医学委员会(GMC)和皇家全科医生学院(RCGP)已发布有关医生使用社交媒体的具体指南,包括考虑潜在的道德挑战(如保密性和专业性)的重要性。但是,尽管这些提供了有关医生及其患者之间在线讨论的广泛建议,但它们未能提供有关使用SMF小组的指导,因此,并未将重点放在使用它们的医生身上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号