首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Psychological Assessment Tools Utilized in Sports Injury Treatment Outcomes Research: A Review
【2h】

Psychological Assessment Tools Utilized in Sports Injury Treatment Outcomes Research: A Review

机译:运动损伤治疗结果中的心理评估工具研究述评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of self-report psychological assessment tools in outcomes research has become increasingly frequent, though many sports medicine providers and researchers are unfamiliar with these instruments. We conducted a systematic search of the sports medicine literature in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar of studies published on or before November 1 , 2019. Included psychological self-assessment tools were limited to those in a written self-assessment format and were used in musculoskeletal sports injury or concussion treatment outcome studies. Both pre- or post-treatment psychological assessments were included. Thirty-four assessment scales of psychological factors were utilized across 152 sports injury treatment outcomes studies. Six assessment tools were utilized in 5 or more studies and the remaining 28 were utilized in 4 or fewer studies. Many of the utilized scales have adequate assessment and reporting of internal consistency reliability, supporting further reliability and validation studies for use in sports injury treatment outcomes research.
机译:尽管许多运动医学提供者和研究人员并不熟悉这些工具,但在结果研究中使用自我报告心理评估工具的频率越来越高。我们对2019年11月1日或之前发布的PubMed,Scopus,SPORTDiscus和Google Scholar研究中的运动医学文献进行了系统搜索。包括的心理自我评估工具仅限于书面自我评估格式,并且用于肌肉骨骼运动损伤或脑震荡治疗结果的研究。包括治疗前或治疗后的心理评估。 152项运动损伤治疗结果研究中使用了34种心理因素评估量表。在5个或更多的研究中使用了6种评估工具,在4个或更少的研究中使用了其余28种评估工具。许多使用的量表都对内部一致性可靠性进行了充分的评估和报告,为运动损伤治疗结果研究中使用的可靠性和验证性研究提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号