• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Evaluation of data concerning the necessity of pymetrozine as an insecticide to control a serious danger to plant health which cannot be contained by other available means including non‐chemical methods
【2h】

Evaluation of data concerning the necessity of pymetrozine as an insecticide to control a serious danger to plant health which cannot be contained by other available means including non‐chemical methods

机译：评估有关吡me嗪作为杀虫剂以控制对植物健康的严重危害的必要性的数据的评估其他可用方法包括非化学方法都无法遏制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The European Food Safety Authority ( ) was requested by the European Commission to provide scientific assistance under Article 31 of Regulation ( ) No 178/2002 regarding the evaluation of data concerning the necessity of pymetrozine as an insecticide to control a serious danger to plant health, which cannot be contained by other available means including non‐chemical methods, in accordance with Article 4(7) of Regulation ( ) No 1107/2009. In this context, organised a commenting phase with Member States in order to collect and validate the data submitted by the applicant. The current scientific report summarises the outcome of the evaluation of more than 100 crop (group)/pest combinations in 10 Member States. The evaluation demonstrated that not a wide range of alternative insecticide active substances to pymetrozine are available to chemically control pollen beetle, whitefly and aphids in various crops (open field and protected use); however for several crop(group)/pest combinations, sufficient chemical alternatives are available. The evaluation included an assessment of non‐chemical alternatives for the presented uses. A wide range of non‐chemical methods are available, often these methods do not have the same efficacy as chemical methods or have economic limitations. However, for some crop/pest combinations, particularly under protected use non‐chemical methods are highly effective and considered feasible.
机译：欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局（）根据法规（）No.178 / 2002第31条提供科学援助，涉及评估有关吡me嗪作为杀虫剂以控制严重危害植物健康的必要性的数据，根据法规（）No.1107 / 2009的第4（7）条，其不能通过其他可用方法（包括非化学方法）包含。在这方面，与会员国组织了一个评议阶段，以收集和验证申请人提交的数据。当前的科学报告总结了10个成员国对100多种作物（组）/害虫组合的评价结果​​。评估表明，尚无广泛的替代吡me嗪的杀虫剂活性物质可化学防治各种作物中的花粉甲虫，粉虱和蚜虫（大田和受保护的使用）;但是，对于几种作物（组）/害虫的组合，可以使用足够的化学替代品。评估包括对所提出用途的非化学替代品的评估。可以使用多种非化学方法，通常这些方法的功效与化学方法不同或存在经济限制。但是，对于某些农作物/害虫的组合，尤其是在受保护的使用下，非化学方法非常有效并且被认为是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号