• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >A Response to Comparison Between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Effect on Nursing Students’ Immediate Knowledge Retention Letter
【2h】

A Response to Comparison Between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Effect on Nursing Students’ Immediate Knowledge Retention Letter

机译：响应基于问题的学习与讲座的比较：对护理学生直接知识保留的影响信

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I read, with great interest, the article by Solomon which compared problem-based learning and lecture-based learning methodologies amongst nursing students.1 The study found that lecture-based learning was better at increasing immediate knowledge retention and preferred by students compared to problem-based learning. As a medical student, I believe these findings are deeply relevant. Medical schools around the world have integrated problem-based learning into their curriculums and reduced the amount of lecture-based teaching.2 However, there are a few points regarding the study’s methodology and outcome measures which require further discussion.
机译：我读到了兴趣，所罗门的文章，其中比较了基于问题的学习和讲座的学习方法，在护理学生中。研究发现，基于讲座的学习更好地提高了立即的知识保留，并通过学生更好地获得了问题基于学习。作为一名医学生，我认为这些发现非常相关。世界各地的医学院将基于问题的学习纳入其课程，减少了基于讲座的教学量.2但是，有几点有关需要进一步讨论的方法的方法和结果措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号