• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China
【2h】

The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China

机译：认知信任和社会信任对公共接受转基因食品的影响：中国的实证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Most studies exploring the public acceptance of genetically modified food (GMF) are based on social trust and the establishment of a causal model. The underlying premise is that social trust indirectly affects public acceptance of GMF through perceived risks and perceived benefits. The object of social trust is trust in people, organizations, and institutions. Different from the social trust, epistemic trust refers to people’s trust in scientific knowledge behind the technology of concern. It has been shown that epistemic trust, like social trust, is also an important factor that affects the public perception of applicable risks and benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate epistemic trust into the causal model to derive a more complete explanation of public acceptance. However, such work has not been conducted to date. The causal model proposed in this paper integrated epistemic trust and social trust and divided social trust into trust in public organizations and trust in industrial organizations. A representative questionnaire survey (N = 1091) was conducted with Chinese adults. The model was analyzed by the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. Three major findings were obtained: First, epistemic trust is an important antecedent of perceived risks and perceived benefits and exerts a significant indirect effect on the acceptance of GMF. Secondly, trust in industrial organizations negatively impacts perceived risks, while trust in public organizations positively impacts perceived benefits. Thirdly, contrary to the common opinion, trust in industrial organizations did not exert a significant direct effect on perceived benefits, and trust in public organizations did not demonstrate a significant direct effect on perceived risks. Therefore, trust in industrial organizations and trust in public organizations utilize different influence paths on GMF acceptance. This study enriches the understanding of the influence path of trust with regard to the acceptance of emerging technologies and is of great significance to relevant risk-management practices.
机译：大多数研究探索公众接受转基因食品（GMF）的基础是社会信任和建立因果模式。潜在的前提是社会信任间接影响公众通过感知风险和感知福利对GMF的接受。社会信任的对象是信任人，组织和机构。与社会信任不同，认识信任是指人们对关注技术背后的科学知识的信任。已经表明，像社会信任一样的认识信任也是影响公众对适用风险和福利的重要因素。因此，必须将认知信任纳入因果模型，从而获得对公众接受的更完整的解释。但是，这些工作尚未进行到目前为止。本文提出的因果模型综合认识到认识信任和社会信任，并将社会信任分为对公共组织的信任，并对工业组织的信任。代表性调查问卷调查（n = 1091）是用中国成人进行的。通过局部最小二乘结构方程建模（PLS-SEM）方法分析该模型。获得了三个主要调查结果：首先，认知信任是感知风险和感知益处的重要前提，对GMF接受产生了显着的间接影响。其次，在工业组织的信任对感知风险产生负面影响，而在公共组织的信任积极影响感知的福利。第三，与普遍看法相反，在工业组织的信任对感知利益没有显着直接影响，并且对公共组织的信任没有表现出对感知风险的显着直接影响。因此，信任工业组织和在公共组织的信任利用不同的影响力的GMF接受。本研究丰富了对信任影响路径的认识，了解新兴技术的接受，对相关的风险管理实践具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号