首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Citizen Participation in Patient Prioritization Policy Decisions: An Empirical and Experimental Study on Patients' Characteristics
【2h】

Citizen Participation in Patient Prioritization Policy Decisions: An Empirical and Experimental Study on Patients' Characteristics

机译:公民参与患者优先政策决策:患者特征的实证和实验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Health systems worldwide are grappling with the need to control costs to maintain system viability. With the combination of worsening economic conditions, an aging population and reductions in tax revenues, the pressures to make structural changes are expected to continue growing. Common cost control mechanisms, e.g. curtailment of patient access and treatment prioritization, are likely to be adversely viewed by citizens. It seems therefore wise to include them in the decision making processes that lead up to policy changes. In the context of a multilevel iterative mixed-method design a quantitative survey representative of the German population (N = 2031) was conducted to probe the acceptance of priority setting in medicine and to explore the practicability of direct public involvement. Here we focus on preferences for patients' characteristics (medical aspects, lifestyle and socio-economic status) as possible criteria for prioritizing medical services. A questionnaire with closed response options was fielded to gain insight into attitudes toward broad prioritization criteria of patient groups. Furthermore, a discrete choice experiment was used as a rigorous approach to investigate citizens' preferences toward specific criteria level in context of other criteria. Both the questionnaire and the discrete choice experiment were performed with the same sample. The citizens' own health and social situation are included as explanatory variables. Data were evaluated using corresponding analysis, contingency analysis, logistic regression and a multinomial exploded logit model. The results show that some medical criteria are highly accepted for prioritizing patients whereas socio-economic criteria are rejected.
机译:全世界的卫生系统都在努力控制成本以维持系统的生存能力。随着经济状况恶化,人口老龄化和税收减少,加之进行结构改革的压力预计将继续增长。常见的成本控制机制,例如市民可能会对减少患者的出入和治疗的优先次序感到不利。因此,将它们包括在导致政策变化的决策过程中似乎是明智的。在多层次迭代混合方法设计的背景下,对德国人口(N = 2031)进行了定量调查,以探讨对医学优先级设置的接受程度,并探索直接公众参与的可行性。在这里,我们重点关注对患者特征(医学方面,生活方式和社会经济状况)的偏好,将其作为优先考虑医疗服务的可能标准。提出了带有封闭响应选项的问卷,以了解对患者群体的广泛优先标准的态度。此外,离散选择实验被用作一种严格的方法,以在其他标准的背景下调查公民对特定标准级别的偏好。问卷和离散选择实验均使用相同的样本进行。市民自身的健康和社会状况作为解释变量包括在内。使用相应的分析,权变分析,逻辑回归和多项式分解logit模型评估数据。结果表明,优先考虑患者的某些医学标准被接受,而社会经济标准则被拒绝。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号