• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >In-house or outsourced public services? A social and economic analysis of the impact of spending policy on the private wage share in OECD countries
【2h】

In-house or outsourced public services? A social and economic analysis of the impact of spending policy on the private wage share in OECD countries

机译：内部还是外包公共服务？经济合作与发展组织国家支出政策对私人工资份额影响的社会经济分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyses the relationship between government spending and the distribution of private income between capital and labour. While most previous research assumes that government spending redistributes in favour of the less wealthy, I distinguish between types of expenditures that enhance the bargaining position of labour – that is, unemployment benefits, public sector employment and investment in new capital – and labour-saving and pro-business types of expenditures – that is, outsourcing to private firms. The results are derived from various panel regression techniques on a panel of 19 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries in the period 1985–2010 and show that expenditures on public sector employment and, to a lesser extent, on new capital prevented the private wage share from declining further, even after controlling for labour market institutions, globalisation and technological change. Conversely, expenditures on outsourcing substantially contributed to reducing the private wage share. Unemployment benefits had a non-significant and negative effect on the private wage share because their increase was the consequence of higher levels of unemployment rather than policy. Implications for theory and policy are drawn, including the support for a public employment-led spending policy.
机译：本文分析了政府支出与资本和劳动力之间私人收入分配之间的关系。尽管大多数以前的研究都假设政府支出会重新分配给较富裕的人群，但我区分了可以提高劳动力讨价还价地位的支出类型，即失业救济金，公共部门就业和对新资本的投资，以及节省劳动力和支持企业的支出类型–即外包给私人公司。结果来自1985-2010年间19个经济合作与发展组织（OECD）国家的小组的各种小组回归技术，结果表明，公共部门就业支出以及新资本支出（在较小程度上）即使控制了劳动力市场机构，全球化和技术变革，也阻止了私人工资份额进一步下降。相反，外包支出大大有助于减少私人工资份额。失业救济金对私人工资份额没有重大的负面影响，因为失业救济金的增加是失业率上升而不是政策的结果。得出了对理论和政策的暗示，包括对公共就业主导的支出政策的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号