• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >How can attending physicians be more attentive? On being attentive versus producing attentiveness
【2h】

How can attending physicians be more attentive? On being attentive versus producing attentiveness

机译：主治医生如何更专心？关于专心与产生专心

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article is about caregivers being attentive to patients in healthcare. From earlier work on the understanding of the other, we know that it is impossible to completely understand the experiences of others. By the sharing of subjectivity—intersubjectivity—we may try to ‘grasp’ the other’s point of view. However, we can never assume that the same experience produces the same experience. Now, if it is principally impossible to understand the experience of one another, and if paying attention always implies an understanding of what to pay attention to, then how is it possible to be attentive to the experiences of those who are entirely at the mercy of our care? How can caregivers perceive the impossibility of understanding the experiences of patients as an appeal to be attentive to their experiences? This is discussed in this article. It departs from the authors being confronted with inexplicabilities in the empirical study of attentiveness in healthcare. It presents two examples and discusses the meaning of these emergent properties. This leads to a discussion of the existent literature on the indefiniteness and openness of attentiveness. It becomes clear why, although we can understand and predict much of it, attentiveness will always be characterized by a certain uncontrollability as well.
机译：本文介绍的是护理人员在医疗保健中应注意的事项。从早期对他人的理解的工作中，我们知道不可能完全了解他人的经历。通过主观性（主体间性）的共享，我们可以尝试“抓住”另一方的观点。但是，我们永远不能假设相同的体验会产生相同的体验。现在，如果原则上不可能理解彼此的经历，并且如果关注始终意味着要理解要注意的内容，那么怎么可能去关注那些完全由他人摆布的人的经历呢？我们的照顾？护理人员如何将不可能理解患者的经历作为吸引他们注意其经历的吸引力？本文对此进行了讨论。它与作者在医疗保健专注性的实证研究中面临莫名其妙的问题背道而驰。它提供了两个示例，并讨论了这些紧急属性的含义。这就引起了关于注意力的不确定性和开放性的现有文献的讨论。显而易见的是，为什么尽管我们可以理解和预测很多内容，但是专注力始终也具有一定的不可控制性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号