首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >You hoped we would sleep walk into accepting the collection of our data: controversies surrounding the UK care.data scheme and their wider relevance for biomedical research
【2h】

You hoped we would sleep walk into accepting the collection of our data: controversies surrounding the UK care.data scheme and their wider relevance for biomedical research

机译:您希望我们睡着接受接受我们的数据收集:围绕英国care.data计划的争议及其与生物医学研究的广泛关联

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An ‘Information Centre’ has recently been established by law which has the power to collect, collate and provide access to the medical information forall patients treated by the National Health Service in England, whether in hospitals or by General Practitioners. This so-called ‘care.data’ scheme has given rise to major and ongoing controversies. We will sketch the background of the scheme and look at the responses it has elicited from citizens and medical professionals. In Autumn 2013, NHS England set up a care.data website where citizens could record their concerns regarding the collection of health-related data by the Information Centre. We have reviewed all the comments on this website up until June 2015. We have also analysed the readers’ comments on the coverage of the care.data scheme in one of the main national UK newspapers. When discussing the responses of citizens, we will make a distinction between the problems that citizens detect and the solutions they propose. The solutions that are being perceived as the most relevant ones can be summarized as follows: citizens wish to further the common good without being manipulated into doing it, while at the same time being safeguarded against various abuses. The issue of trust turns out to figure prominently. Our analysis of reactions to the scheme in no way pretends to be exhaustive, yet it provides various relevant insights into the concerns identified by citizens as well as medical professionals. These concerns, moreover, have a more general relevance in relation to other contexts of medical data-mining as well as biobank research. Our analysis also offers important pointers as to how those concerns might be addressed.
机译:根据法律,最近已经建立了一个“信息中心”,该中心有权收集,整理并提供由英格兰国家卫生服务局治疗的所有患者的医疗信息,无论是在医院还是在全科医生中。这种所谓的“ care.data”方案引起了重大且持续的争议。我们将概述该计划的背景,并研究它从公民和医疗专业人员那里得到的回应。 2013年秋天,英格兰NHS建立了care.data网站,市民可以在该网站上记录他们对信息中心收集与健康相关的数据的担忧。截至2015年6月,我们已经审查了该网站上的所有评论。我们还分析了英国主要国家报纸之一中有关care.data计划报道的读者评论。在讨论市民的对策时,我们将区分市民发现的问题和他们提出的解决方案。被认为是最相关的解决方案可以概括如下:公民希望在不被操纵的情况下促进共同利益,同时保护自己免受各种滥用。事实证明,信任问题非常重要。我们对该计划的反应的分析绝不会假装是详尽无遗的,但它为市民以及医疗专业人员所确定的关注提供了各种相关的见解。此外,这些关注与医学数据挖掘和生物库研究的其他情况具有更广泛的相关性。我们的分析还提供了有关如何解决这些问题的重要指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号