...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Academy of Management Review >WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY? TOWARD A CREATIVE SYNTHESIS OF HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES
【24h】

WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY? TOWARD A CREATIVE SYNTHESIS OF HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES

机译：什么是组织历史？致力于历史和组织研究的综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As a synthesis of organization theory and historiography, the field of organizational history is mature enough to contribute to wider theoretical and historiographical debates and is sufficiently developed for a theoretical consideration of its subject matter. In this introduction to the Special Topic Forum on History and Organization Studies, we take up the question, "What is organizational history?" and consider three distinct arguments that we believe frame the next phase of development for historical work within organization studies. First, we argue that following the "historic turn," organizational history has developed as a subfield of organization studies that takes seriously the matter of history, promoting historical research as a way to enrich the broad endeavor of organization. Second, if "history matters," then organization theory needs a theoretical account of the past that goes beyond the mere use of history as a context to test or as cm example to illustrate theory. Third, the focus on "history that matters" in the present leads to two important considerations: how organizations can use "rhetorical history" as a strategic resource and the need to engage with historiographically significant subjects that connect organization theory to larger humanistic concerns, such as slavery and racism.
机译：作为组织理论和史学的综合，组织历史领域已经足够成熟，可以为更广泛的理论和史学辩论做出贡献，并且已经充分发展为对其主题的理论考虑。在“历史与组织研究专题论坛”的简介中，我们提出了一个问题：“什么是组织历史？”并考虑三个我们认为构成组织研究中历史工作的下一阶段发展的不同论点。首先，我们认为，在“历史性转折”之后，组织历史已经发展成为组织研究的一个子领域，它认真地对待历史问题，推动历史研究成为丰富组织广泛努力的一种方式。其次，如果“历史很重要”，那么组织理论需要对过去的理论解释，而不仅仅是对历史的检验或作为例子来说明理论。第三，当前对“重要历史”的关注导致两个重要的考虑：组织如何将“修辞史”用作战略资源，以及需要与将组织理论与更大的人文关注联系起来的史学重大主题的介入作为奴隶制和种族主义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Academy of Management Review》 |2016年第4期|590-608|共19页
  • 作者

    Godfrey Paul C.; Hassard John; OConnor Ellen S.; Rowlinson Michael; Ruef Martin;

  • 作者单位

    Brigham Young Univ, Marriott Sch Management, Business Strategy, Provo, UT 84602 USA;

    Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Org Anal, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England;

    Dominican Univ Calif, Inst Leadership Studies, Barowsky Sch Business, San Rafael, CA USA;

    Univ Exeter, Management & Org Hist, Exeter EX4 4QJ, Devon, England;

    Duke Univ, Entrepreneurship, Durham, NC 27706 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号