• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Neck injury mechanisms in train collisions: Dynamic analysis and data mining of the driver impact injury
【24h】

Neck injury mechanisms in train collisions: Dynamic analysis and data mining of the driver impact injury

机译：火车碰撞中的颈部损伤机制：动态分析和驾驶员冲击损伤的数据开采

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Human necks are vulnerable in train collision accidents. To design a safer cab workspace, the driver neck injury mechanism should be investigated first. In this study, this issue is addressed by investigating how neck injuries are influenced by the cab workspace dimensions. The driver-console-seat dynamic models are developed to quantify the neck injuries. The three-pivot head-neck-upper torso model is used to evaluate the relative rotation angle between head and upper torso (beta+gamma). The injury mechanism with the larger (beta+gamma) value results in more severe neck injuries. The decision tree model is established to explore the most important cab workspace dimensional parameter. The driver submarining posture (the driver exhibits the tendency of sliding down from the seat after contacting the console) generates more (beta+gamma) value than the flipping over behavior (the driver contacts the console and the upper body continues to move over the top of the console). Four neck injury mechanisms are classified, in which the chest-first impact mechanisms are more dangerous than the knee-first impact mechanisms. The distance between the console edge and knee bolster has the greatest effect on the neck injury. This parameter determines the injury mechanism type as it influences the first contact region of the driver. The distance between the console and seat and the pedal height are the secondary dominant attributes. These three parameters should be considered preferentially for establishing driver protection measures.
机译：人类的脖子在火车碰撞事故中脆弱。要设计更安全的驾驶室工作空间，请先调查驾驶员颈部损伤机制。在本研究中，通过调查颈部损伤是如何受驾驶室工作空间尺寸的影响的解决。开发了驱动器控制台动态模型以量化颈部损伤。三枢轴头颈上躯干模型用于评估头部和上躯干（β+伽马）之间的相对旋转角度。具有较大（β+γ）值的损伤机制导致更严重的颈部受伤。建立决策树模型以探索最重要的CAB工作空间尺寸参数。驾驶员潜水姿势（驾驶员在接触控制台后表现出从座椅上滑动的趋势）产生比越过行为的更多（β+伽马）值（驱动器接触控制台，上半身继续移动到顶部控制台）。四个颈部损伤机制分类，其中胸部第一冲击机制比膝盖第一冲击机制更危险。控制台边缘和膝关节螺栓之间的距离对颈部损伤具有最大的影响。该参数确定损伤机制类型，因为它影响了驾驶员的第一接触区域。控制台和座椅和踏板高度之间的距离是二级主导属性。应优先考虑这三个参数，以建立驾驶员保护措施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accident Analysis & Prevention》 |2020年第10期|105725.1-105725.12|共12页
  • 作者

    Hou Lin; Peng Yong; Sun Dong;

  • 作者单位

    City Univ Hong Kong Dept Biomed Engn Kowloon Hong Kong Peoples R China|Cent South Univ Sch Traff & Transportat Engn Key Lab Traff Safety Track Minist Educ Changsha 410075 Peoples R China;

    Cent South Univ Sch Traff & Transportat Engn Key Lab Traff Safety Track Minist Educ Changsha 410075 Peoples R China;

    City Univ Hong Kong Dept Biomed Engn Kowloon Hong Kong Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Train collision; Cab workspace; Human neck injury; Impact injury mechanism; Data mining;

    机译：火车碰撞;驾驶室工作区;人类颈部损伤;冲击损伤机制;数据挖掘;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号