• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Analytica >Defeaters and Rising Standards of Justification
【24h】

Defeaters and Rising Standards of Justification

机译：失败者和不断提高的辩护标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to refute the widespread view that challenging a knowledge-claim always raises the original standards of justification–a view often associated with contextualism. To that purpose the distinction between undermining and overriding defeaters will be used. Three kinds of challenges will be considered that differ in their degree of specification. In all three kinds of challenges, the rising standards of justification model fails to capture the dialectic of justification in the case of undermining defeaters. At the end, the skeptical challenge will more briefly be given a similar analysis.
机译：本文的目的是反驳普遍存在的观点，即挑战知识主张总是会提高证明的原始标准，这种观点通常与情境主义有关。为此，将使用破坏者和压倒者的区别。将考虑三种规范程度不同的挑战。在所有三种挑战中，在破坏者败北的情况下，正当化模型的标准不断提高，未能抓住正当化的辩证法。最后，将对怀疑的挑战进行更简短的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号