...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Advanced Materials >Response to comment by Di Ventra on 'Molecular junctions: Clearing Mists'
【24h】

Response to comment by Di Ventra on 'Molecular junctions: Clearing Mists'

机译：对狄文特拉对“分子交界处：清除雾气”的评论的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We are grateful to Prof. Di Ventra for pointing out values that were misquoted in our review. These discrepancies are too small to alter our main point, which is that theory and experiment are now in much better alignment in this field. Lest DiVentra's comment be taken to imply that the jellium model - which neglects chemical detail - gives better values than a full atomisitic treatment, we point out the following discrepancy: calculations of the effect of including a gold adatom in the tunneling path for 1,4-phenyldithiol show that the conductance is significantly increased. In contrast, the jellium model predicts a two-order of magnitude decrease in conductance in this case, a result that isrndifficult to reconcile with the unit quantum conductance of a line of gold atoms.
机译：我们感谢Di Ventra教授指出了我们的评论中错误引用的价值观。这些差异太小而无法改变我们的要点，这就是说理论和实验现在在该领域的一致性更好。唯恐DiVentra的评论暗示，忽略化学细节的凝胶模型比完全雾化处理具有更好的价值，我们指出了以下差异：计算在1,4的隧穿路径中包含金原子的影响-苯基二硫醇表明电导显着增加。相反，在这种情况下，the模型预测了电导的两个数量级的降低，这一结果很难与金原子线的单位量子电导相协调。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Advanced Materials》 |2009年第16期|1548-1548|共1页
  • 作者

    Stuart. M. Lindsay; Mark A. Rattier;

  • 作者单位

    Departments of Physics and Chemistry and the Biodesign Institute Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-5601 (USA);

    Department of Chemistry and Institute for Nanotechnology Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60208 (USA);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号