• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Aerospace >OUR PRESIDENT
【24h】

OUR PRESIDENT

机译：我们的主席

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As I write this article two topics are in the headlines which appear on the surface to be unconnected but which have mutual relevance to the aerospace sector. The first is the investigation into the two crashes involving the Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft and the second is Brexit. Effective regulation lies at the heart of aviation safety. As Tom Enders so eloquently put it: "Safety is not a competition item," and the independence of national and transnational aviation safety regulators in consistently applying a layer of scrutiny to absolute standards regardless of commercial pressures is a vital pillar to maintaining the safety and confidence of the travelling public. I have personal experience of certifying a new mainline engine through EASA and have experienced the constructive tension which is inevitable between a commercial team who are under pressure to deliver into service and the regulatory body. I have experienced the frustration when a significant certification item (birdstrike testing in my case) raises issues of judgement between the two parties when a test result does not meet the letter of a regulation which was not written with that particular configuration in mind, I could never fail to be impressed by the professionalism of the regulatory team I was dealing with and the logic they applied in making my team prove that what we were asking them to certify met the required safety standards. They were able to do so because their team had the necessary qualifications and expertise to be able to understand the underlying technical arguments and design implications and therefore enable an appropriate dialogue.
机译：据我写这篇文章，两个主题是在表面上出现的头条新闻，但与航空航天部门相互相关。首先是调查涉及波音737最大8架飞机的两架崩溃，第二次是Brexit。有效的监管在于航空安全的核心。作为汤姆内酯如此雄辩地提出它：“安全不是竞争项目”，以及国家和跨国航空安全监管机构的独立性，始终应用一层审查，无论商业压力如何，是维持安全的重要柱子旅行公众的信心。我拥有通过EASA认证新的主线引擎的个人经验，并经历了在承担投入服务和监管机构的商业团队之间是不可避免的建设性的张力。当一个重要的认证项目（在我的案件中的鸟类测试）时，我经历了令人沮丧的是，当测试结果没有符合没有用这种规定的法规的信件时，在两党的信中提出了两方之间的判断问题，我可以永远不会被我处理的监管团队的专业性留下深刻印象，他们申请的逻辑让我的团队证明我们要求他们证明所需的安全标准。他们能够这样做，因为他们的团队有必要的资格和专业知识，能够理解潜在的技术论证和设计意义，因此可以实现适当的对话。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Aerospace》 |2019年第5期|42-42|共1页
  • 作者

    Simon Henley;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号