【24h】

Letters

机译:字母

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Regarding Mr.Tirpak's article, "Gates Versus the Air Force," March [p. 54], I am quite certain I am not alone in wholeheartedly agreeing with General Moseley's assertion that the nation expects our Air Force to be prepared to fight/conduct more than just today's fight. As the general so aptly put it, "It's not either-or." Everything we were taught in War College tells us that (to think beyond "this-war-itis"). And Mr. Gates' weaker excuse for chopping the F-22, that we'll just build more F-35s, was completely off the mark. Anyone who knows anything about these two aircraft knows the F-35 is no substitute, with capabilities so dissimilar. We simply do not have enough Raptors today to meet the national strategy. Current events in the Crimea may be the beginnings of a re-emerging Soviet Union, which should make us think about what Gates did to the F-22.
机译:关于提尔帕克先生的文章,“大门与空军”,三月[第54页],我可以肯定地说,我不会一个人全心全意地同意莫斯利将军的主张,即国家希望我们的空军比今天的战斗更多地准备战斗/指挥。正如将军所说的那样:“不是非此即彼。”战争学院所教授的一切都告诉我们(超越“这场战争”思考)。盖茨先生砍下F-22的较弱借口(我们将只制造更多F-35)是完全没有道理的。任何对这两架飞机一无所知的人都知道F-35不能替代,其功能是如此相似。我们今天没有足够的猛禽来满足国家战略。克里米亚的当前事件可能是重新崛起的苏联的开端,这应该使我们考虑盖茨对F-22所做的努力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Air Force Magazine》 |2014年第5期|6-8|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号