【24h】

LETTERS

机译:字母

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Your editorial in the December 2018 issue, entitled "The Air-and Space- Force We Need" [p. 2] was very in-teresting. It provides a light on the thinking behind the Air Force's position on the need for a Space Force. It is reminiscent of a piece that could well have been written in 1947 with regard to the need for an "Air Force." I am certain that while the Army saw little need for the creation of a new service, it undoubtedly saw the likelihood for a reduction in size and mission after the end of World War Ⅱ and realized that much of the new strategy would place an emphasis on air supremacy (especially the doctrine of massive retaliation). In light of the possibility of a threat from the Soviet Union, some of the statements in your critique could have been lifted Verbatim from the Ar-my's perspective on the need for an Air Force. For example, "The logic is that space (air) is a unique domain, that pri-or administrations underinvested there, and that a new bureaucracy is needed to guide development of space- (air) based capabilities," or "America does not need a Secretary of the Space (Air) Force. Adding a Space (Air) Force Chief of Staff will not increase the lethality of the US military. The Joint Chiefs will not become wiser with the addition of an eighth four-star generai."
机译:您在2018年12月号的社论中,标题为“我们需要的空军和太空部队”。 2]非常有趣。它阐明了空军对太空部队的需求背后的想法。这让人想起本来可以在1947年写的关于“空军”需求的文章。我敢肯定,尽管陆军几乎不需要建立新的服役,但毫无疑问,它看到了可能会在第二次世界大战结束后缩小规模和减少任务,并意识到许多新策略将重点放在空中优势(特别是大规模报复主义)上。鉴于苏联威胁的可能性,从Ar-my关于空军需求的角度来看,您的批评中的某些说法本来可以从逐字记录中删除。例如,“逻辑是空间(空中)是一个独特的领域,先前的主管部门在该领域投资不足,并且需要新的官僚机构来指导基于空间(空中)的能力的发展”或“美国不需要太空(空军)部长,增加太空(空军)参谋长不会增加美军的杀伤力,联合首长不会因为增加第八颗四星而变得更明智属。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Air Force Magazine》 |2019年第1期|4-6|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号