• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Air Force Magazine >The Air Base: The Air Force's Achilles' Heel?
【24h】

The Air Base: The Air Force's Achilles' Heel?

机译：空中基地：空军的阿基里斯的脚跟？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

History shows that air bases have played a vitally important role in a U.S. air commander's ability to achieve increased effectiveness through the maneuver of air power at the operational level of war. But future air commanders' ability to maneuver air power at sea on aircraft carriers or at land air bases will be seriously challenged in a near-peer or peer conflict. Aircraft carriers conducting sustained air operations close to land sacrifice the protection mobility provides and could risk unacceptable losses. Further, opponents such as China and Russia are too distant from the sea to be within the range of unrefueled, carrier-based aircraft, and advancements in surveillance and precision missile technology pose a dual and increasingly dangerous threat to carriers, despite their mobility. Finally, as accidents during the Vietnam War demonstrated, the concentration of large numbers of aircraft, fuel, munitions, and personnel on a small carrier deck poses a major risk should any attack reach its intended target; even if the ship itself survives, it would likely have to leave the area to make lengthy repairs. In contrast to carriers, air commanders can still conduct survivable air power maneuver using land bases, provided the Air Force recognizes the critical importance of making the air base a key concern when establishing aircraft requirements. While aircraft are now seen as weapons systems that require integration of the airframe, engine, avionics, and munitions, the Air Force has neglected appropriate planning for air base requirements to ensure aircraft can operate effectively at the operational level of war against a near-peer opponent. The Department of Defense often makes the unexamined assumption during tactically oriented exercises that air power will always be available and operable. Yet the growing threat from precision attacks by near-peer precision attacks suggests that may not be the case.
机译：历史表明，空中基地在美国航空指挥官通过战争级别的空中动力机动实现了效益的能力，在大力发挥着重要作用。但是，未来的空中指挥官在近同行或同行冲突中会受到严重挑战海上海上的空中能力的能力。飞机载体进行持续的空气运营接近土地牺牲，保护流动性提供了不可接受的损失。此外，诸如中国和俄罗斯的反对者太远，距离未加工，基于运营商的飞机的范围内，监测和精密导弹技术的进步尽管他们的流动性，但却对运营商构成了双重和越来越危险的威胁。最后，由于越南战争期间的事故证明，大量航空器，燃料，弹药和人员的小型载体甲板的浓度会产生重大风险，如果任何攻击都达到预期目标;即使船舶本身幸存下来，它也可能不得不离开该地区延长维修。与载体相比，空中指挥官仍然可以使用土地基地进行可生存的空气动作，只要空军识别出空中基地在建立飞机要求时关注关键问题的关键重要性。虽然飞机现在被视为需要整合机身，发动机，航空电子设备和弹药的武器系统，但空军已经忽视了适当规划的空中基地要求，以确保飞机可以在近同行的战争的运营水平上有效运行对手。防守部经常在战术上进行未经审查的假设，以至于空中电力将始终可用和可操作。然而，近同行精确攻击的精度攻击的越来越大的威胁表明可能不是这种情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号