...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Air International >Commission Rejects British Island Airport
【24h】

Commission Rejects British Island Airport

机译：委员会拒绝不列颠岛机场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The UK Airports Commission has dismissed the Thames Estuary airport proposal on the grounds it would be too expensive and cause economic disruption. It has instead recommended that any new development to create more capacity should be undertaken at either Heathrow or Gatwick. Commission Chairman Sir Howard Davies said: "While we recognise the need for a hub airport, we believe this should be a part of an effective system of competing airports. There are serious doubts about the delivery and operation of a very large hub airport in the estuary. The economic disruption would be huge and there are environmental hurdles, which may prove impossible, or very time-consuming to surmount. Even the least ambitious version of the scheme would cost £70 [billion] to £90 billion with much greater public expenditure involved than in other options - probably some £30 [billion] to £60 billion in total. There will be those who argue that the commission lacks ambition and imagination. We are ambitious for the right solution. The need for additional capacity is urgent. We need to focus on solutions which are deliverable [and] affordable."
机译：英国机场委员会驳回了泰晤士河口机场的提议，理由是该提议过于昂贵并会造成经济中断。相反，它建议在希思罗机场或盖特威克机场进行任何旨在提高能力的新发展。委员会主席霍华德·戴维斯爵士说：“虽然我们认识到需要枢纽机场，但我们认为这应该是有效的竞争性机场系统的一部分。人们对于在该机场建造和运营一个大型枢纽机场存在严重疑问。经济破坏将是巨大的，并且存在环境障碍，这可能被证明是不可能的，或者是非常耗时的克服方案，即使是最雄心勃勃的计划的费用也将在70亿英镑至900亿英镑之间，而公众的参与则更多。比其他方案要多的支出-总计约30十亿英镑至600亿英镑。有人会认为该委员会缺乏野心和想象力。我们雄心勃勃地寻求正确的解决方案。迫切需要增加产能我们需要关注可交付的[和]可负​​担的解决方案。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号