...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Agricultural Economics >Is There Persistence in the Impact of Emergency Food Aid? Evidence on Consumption, Food Security, and Assets in Rural Ethiopia
【24h】

Is There Persistence in the Impact of Emergency Food Aid? Evidence on Consumption, Food Security, and Assets in Rural Ethiopia

机译：紧急粮食援助的影响是否持续存在？埃塞俄比亚农村地区消费，粮食安全和资产的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We identify the impact of emergency food aid programs after the 2002 drought in rural Ethiopia on future welfare. Based on a difference-in-differences matching estimator, participation in food-for-work increases growth in total consumption and food consumption eighteen months after the drought. Separately, receiving free food raises growth in food consumption, but, surprisingly, negatively impacts food security. Food-for-work benefited households in the middle and upper tail of the consumption distribution, while the better-targeted free food program benefited the poorest. Evidence suggests these impacts demonstrate accumulated and persistent effects of food aid received in the first twelve months after the drought.
机译：我们确定了2002年埃塞俄比亚农村干旱后的紧急粮食援助计划对未来福利的影响。根据差异差异匹配估计量，参加工作换食品会增加干旱后十八个月的总消费和粮食消费的增长。另外，免费获得食物会增加食物消费的增长，但令人惊讶的是，这对粮食安全产生了负面影响。以工换粮使消费分配中上端的家庭受益，而针对性更强的免费粮食计划使最贫穷的人受益。有证据表明，这些影响表明干旱后头十二个月收到的粮食援助具有累积性和持久性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号