• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Privatizing the Urban Commons Under Ambiguous Property Rights in China: Is Marketization a Remedy to the Tragedy of the Commons?
【24h】

Privatizing the Urban Commons Under Ambiguous Property Rights in China: Is Marketization a Remedy to the Tragedy of the Commons?

机译：在中国的暧昧产权下私有化城市公共：市场化是对公共悲剧的补救措施吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The debate on the vitality of the commons remains unsettled, but the attempt by the Chinese state to develop a marketized property rights system to address the so-called tragedy of the commons has backfired. In Shanghai and other major Chinese cities, the economic transformation has led to an ambiguous property rights system that creates complex and uncertain property relations between the state and private land developers. The resulting ineffective uses and conflicts in the commons are well known, but how to address them is contested. Can privatization drive better use of urban land in China? How do the ambiguous property relations between the state and the private sector affect the spatial design, management, use, and quality of the urban commons in Chinese cities? This article addresses these questions by engaging theoretical debates on how the commons should be held, analyzing the origin and key features of the ambiguous property relation in China, and drawing on a property rights approach to investigate the empirical case of a specific privately owned and managed urban park in Shanghai. The results show that not only does the commodification of property create inherently pervasive ambiguity in the land market, marketization also denies citizens their rights to public space. These findings raise fundamental questions about the idea that marketizing land is a sure tonic to address social problems. The article puts the case for reconsidering the institutionalization of the urban commons.
机译：关于争议的争论仍然不稳定，但中国国家的企图开发市场化产权制度，以解决公元的所谓悲剧。在上海和其他主要的中国城市，经济转型导致了一个模棱两实的产权制度，造成了国家和私人土地开发商之间的复杂和不确定的财产关系。由此产生的无效用途和公共场合的冲突是众所周知的，但如何解决它们是有争议的。私有化可以更好地推动中国的城市土地吗？国家和私营部门之间的暧昧物业关系如何影响中国城市城市公共城市的空间设计，管理，使用和质量？本文通过从事关于如何举行的理论辩论，分析中国暧昧财产关系的起源和关键特征，并借鉴财产方式来调查特定私营和管理的实证情况的理论辩论城市公园在上海。结果表明，物业的商品不仅在土地市场中创造了本质上普遍的歧义，市场化也否认公民的公共空间的权利。这些发现提出了关于营销土地是一种确定的滋补来解决社会问题的基本问题。本文提出了重新考虑城市公共的制度化的情况。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Wang Yiming; Chen Jie;

  • 作者单位

    Tongji Univ Coll Architecture & Urban Planning Shanghai Peoples R China;

    Tongji Univ Coll Architecture & Urban Planning Shanghai Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号