首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Family Therapy >Validity and Reliability of Three Rating Scales to Assess Practitioners’ Skills to Conduct Collaborative, Strength-Based, Systemic Work in Family-Based Services
【24h】

Validity and Reliability of Three Rating Scales to Assess Practitioners’ Skills to Conduct Collaborative, Strength-Based, Systemic Work in Family-Based Services

机译:三种评估量表的有效性和可靠性,以评估从业人员在基于家庭的服务中开展协作,基于力量的系统工作的技能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study analyzed the reliability and validity of three rating scales designed to assess practitioners’ skills in conducting systemic, collaborative, and strength-based assessments and interventions with multi-challenged families in family-based community services. The three scales, which assess reception and assessment skills, basic skills, and skills to support change, revealed good psychometric properties considering their construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater agreement. The results are discussed considering future research and possible applications of the scales in research and practice.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2011.627316
机译:这项研究分析了三个评估量表的信度和效度,这些评估量表旨在评估从业者在基于家庭的社区服务中对多才多艺的家庭进行系统,协作和基于力量的评估和干预的技能。评估接收和评估技能,基本技能和支持变化的技能的三个量表显示出良好的心理测量特性,考虑到其构造效度,内部一致性和评估者之间的一致性。讨论了结果,并考虑了将来的研究以及该秤在研究和实践中的可能应用。 ,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2011.627316

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号