首页> 外文期刊>Anthropology of Consciousness >SPECIAL SECTION: The Future of a Discipline: Considering the Ontological/Methodological Future of the Anthropology of Consciousness, Part II†
【24h】

SPECIAL SECTION: The Future of a Discipline: Considering the Ontological/Methodological Future of the Anthropology of Consciousness, Part II†

机译:特别部分:学科的未来:考虑意识人类学的本体论/方法论的未来,第二部分†

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACTIn order for the valuable research published in the Anthropology of Consciousness (AoC) journal to have the impact it ought to have upon the anthropological mainstream, contributors must demonstrate that they appreciate the historical tradition of anthropology as an intellectual forebear. Although “ethnometaphysics” has been cited sporadically by anthropologists over the past half-century, it never really caught on as an interdisciplinary speciality like ethnobotany, ethnomusicology, and ethnomathematics. Pointing to the example of discord in the West between viewing psychoactive substances as either “hallucinogens” or “entheogens,” I reassert ethnometaphysics in an aim to revamp the overlooked coining of this sub-field by anthropologist A. Irving Hallowell. Such a position rebrands SAC's alternative outlook in a way that could be seen by mainstream colleagues as less radical, thus giving the Society a more realistic opportunity to provoke progressive changes in the mainstream of our discipline.
机译:摘要为了使《意识人类学》(AoC)期刊上发表的宝贵研究成果对人类学主流产生影响,贡献者必须证明他们赞赏人类学的历史传统作为知识先驱。尽管在过去的半个世纪中,人类学家零星地引用了“民族经济学”,但它从来没有像民族植物学,民族音乐学和民族数学学那样真正成为跨学科专业。指出西方在将精神活性物质视为“ hallucinogens”或“ entheogens”之间存在分歧的例子,我重申民族统计学,以期改正人类学家A. Irving Hallowell对这一子领域的忽视。这样的立场以主流同事认为不太激进的方式重塑了SAC的另类观点,从而为协会提供了更现实的机会来激发我们学科主流的逐步变革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号