...
首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >The end of criminal antitrust's per se conclusive presumptions
【24h】

The end of criminal antitrust's per se conclusive presumptions

机译:刑事反托拉斯本身结论性推定的终结

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Supreme Court in the Booker line of cases revolutionized sentencing law by applying a criminal defendant's constitutional right for a jury, not a judge, to decide key sentencing fact issues. Applying this constitutional line of cases in the course of defending a criminal antitrust case led to bringing together four separate silos of law with four revolutionary implications for antitrust: criminal antitrust, Sixth Amendment rights to jury fact finding, constitutional limits on the use of conclusive presumptions in jury instructions, and the constitutional prohibition of federal common law crimes. The four revolutionary implications for antitrust were as stunning for the author as they are sure to be to the antitrust bar, any one of which, when adopted by the courts or the Antitrust Division, will end criminal antitrust's long-accepted practices regarding per se conclusive presumptions.
机译:最高法院在布克案件系列中,通过将刑事被告的宪法权利适用于陪审团而非法官来裁定关键的判决事实问题,从而彻底改变了判决法律。在为刑事反托拉斯案件辩护的过程中运用这一宪法性案例导致了四个单独的法律孤岛,对反托拉斯具有四个革命性的涵义:刑事反托拉斯,陪审团事实认定的第六修正权,使用结论性推定的宪法限制陪审团指示,以及宪法禁止联邦普通法犯罪的规定。对于作者而言,反托拉斯的四项革命性影响令作者惊叹不已,因为它们必定会在反托拉斯酒吧中脱颖而出,其中任何一项,如果被法院或反托拉斯分庭采用,将终结刑事反托拉斯长期以来就其本身的结论性做法所接受的做法。推定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号