The law and economics of the NCAA's claim to monopsony rights

Jeffrey L. Harrison; Casey C. Harrison

首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >The law and economics of the NCAA's claim to monopsony rights

【24h】

The law and economics of the NCAA's claim to monopsony rights

机译：NCAA拥有一夫一妻制权利的法律和经济学

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Since its inception in 1905, the NCAA has engaged in practices that affect both output and input markets. In output markets, the impact is felt in the sale of sports or sports entertainment products. In input markets, the impact falls primarily on labor. The practices of the NCAA in one output market-television broadcast rights-were considered most prominently by the U. S. Supreme Court in NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma.1 Although subject to somewhat less publicity, a number of courts have also examined the NCAA's efforts in the input markets composed of coaches and players.2 Within these input markets, the NCAA possesses significant monopsony power.3

机译：自1905年成立以来，NCAA从事影响产出和投入市场的实践。在产出市场中，体育或体育娱乐产品的销售受到影响。在投入品市场，影响主要落在劳动力上。美国最高法院在《 NCAA诉俄克拉荷马大学董事局》一案中，最为突出地考虑了NCAA在一个输出市场（电视转播权）中的做法。1尽管受到了较少的宣传，但许多法院还考察了NCAA在由教练和球员组成的投入市场中所做的努力。2在这些投入市场中，NCAA具有显着的垄断能力。3

著录项

来源
《The Antitrust Bulletin》 |2009年第4期|p.923-949|共27页
作者
Jeffrey L. Harrison; Casey C. Harrison;
展开▼
作者单位

Stephen C. O'Connell Chair and Professor of Law, College of Law,University of Florida;

J.D., M.S. (Sports Management), University of Florida (expected 2010);

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Monopsony in Law and Economics [J] . Pierre Y. Cremieux Journal of Economic Literature . 2011,第4期

机译：法律经济学专论
2. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Armed Conflict: International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law [J] . Elizabeth Mottershaw The International Journal of Human Rights . 2008,第3期

机译：武装冲突中的经济，社会和文化权利：国际人权法和国际人道主义法
3. Ellie Palmer, Judicial Review, Socio-economic Rights And The Human Rights Act. Hart Publishing, 2007. 345 Pp. Mark Tushnet, Weak Courts, Strong Courts: Judicial Review And Social Welfare Rights In Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton University Press [J] . Keith D. Ewing International journal of constitutional law . 2009,第1期

机译：埃利·帕尔默（Ellie Palmer），《司法审查》，《社会经济权利和人权法》。哈特出版社，2007年。345页。马克·图什内特（Mark Tushnet），《弱法院》，《高等法院：比较宪法》中的司法审查和社会福利权。普林斯顿大学出版社
4. The Restitution Claim: Perspectives in Defending the Real Estate Ownership Rights in Light of the New Civil Code and Further Specific Laws [C] . Berechet M.N. National Conference New Romanian Civil Code. . 2013

机译：拒绝索赔：鉴于新的民法和进一步的具体法律，捍卫房地产所有权权利的观点
5. The legal recognition particularly by international law and European community law of special economic dependency and preferential rights as claimed in relation to fisheries. [D] . Wallace, Rebecca Mairi MacLean. 1982

机译：特别是国际法和欧洲共同体法律对与渔业有关的特殊经济依附关系和优先权的法律承认。
6. Law and Medical Practice: Rights Duties Claims and Defences [O] . M. Charlesworth 2000

机译：法律和医疗实践：权利义务主张和抗辩
7. Relationship between International Human Rights Law and General International Law: Assessing the Specialty Claims of International Human Rights Law. [O] . Vanneste Frédéric 2009

机译：国际人权法与一般国际法之间的关系：评估国际人权法的特殊要求。

The law and economics of the NCAA's claim to monopsony rights

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅