...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >Texaco v. Dagher: Opportunities missed and neglected
【24h】

Texaco v. Dagher: Opportunities missed and neglected

机译：德士古诉达格案：机会错失良机

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The present Supreme Court is active in antitrust, but in a rather predictable and peculiar manner. Beginning with Trinko, the Court has granted certiorari in eight antitrust cases. In each case, the plaintiff prevailed in the court of appeals. In each case, the government took the side of the defendant in the Supreme Court, and argued for a ruling that would make antitrust enforcement more restricted and difficult. In each case, the Supreme Court ruled for the defendant.~(238) In each case, except Trinko, which is replete with dicta making private enforcement more difficult, the Court's ruling was narrow and limited, providing little guidance beyond the holding of the decision. Of all these, perhaps the narrowest and least helpful to the future of antitrust is Dagher, where the Supreme Court traversed a treasure house of significant issues awaiting explication and clarification, and neither touched nor was touched by them. For this, perhaps plaintiffs should be glad.
机译：目前的最高法院积极参与反托拉斯，但以一种可预见的和特殊的方式进行。从Trinko开始，法院已在8个反托拉斯案件中授予了证明书。在每种情况下，原告都在上诉法院中胜诉。在每种情况下，政府都在最高法院中代表被告，并主张一项裁决，使反托拉斯法的执行更加严格和困难。在每种情况下，最高法院都会判决被告人。（238）在每种情况下，除了特林科（Trinko）充斥着使私人执法更加困难的命令外，法院的裁决是狭and而有限的，几乎没有提供任何指导性意见。决定。在所有这些中，也许对反托拉斯的未来最狭窄和最不利的是达格，最高法院在那儿遍历了一个重要问题的宝库，等待解释和澄清，它们丝毫没有动过也没有动过。为此，也许原告应该感到高兴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号